Logitech DS3

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Logitech DS3

by logitech » Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:19 pm
OA E
Attachments
DS3.jpg
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by jackcrystal » Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:43 pm
E ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:47 pm
jackcrystal wrote:E ?
Surprise!!! :lol:
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:48 pm
question stem: d1/r1 > d2/r2

Statement I and II are clearly insufficient.

In statement I r1 & r2 can be same numbers or different numbers. Therefore we can have both cases, smaller & greater. Insufficient.

Similarly In statement II d1 & d2 can be same numbers or different numbers. Insufficient.

Combining I & II
let d2=1, d1=31
let r2=1, r1=31

d1/r1 > d2/r2
31/31 > 1/1
1>1--------------------NO

let d2=10, d1=40
let r2=15, r1=45

d1/r1 > d2/r2
40/10 > 45/15
4>3---------------------YES


Insufficient.

Hence E.
No rest for the Wicked....

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:04 am
parallel_chase wrote:question stem: d1/r1 > d2/r2

Statement I and II are clearly insufficient.

In statement I r1 & r2 can be same numbers or different numbers. Therefore we can have both cases, smaller & greater. Insufficient.

Similarly In statement II d1 & d2 can be same numbers or different numbers. Insufficient.

Combining I & II
let d2=1, d1=31
let r2=1, r1=31

d1/r1 > d2/r2
31/31 > 1/1
1>1--------------------NO

let d2=10, d1=40
let r2=15, r1=45

d1/r1 > d2/r2
40/10 > 45/15
4>3---------------------YES


Insufficient.

Hence E.
d1/r1 > d2/r2

(d1/r1) - (d2/r2) > 0

d1r2-d2r1 / (r1r2) > 0

we know that r1r2 is positive

so it boils down to whether d1r2 > d2r1
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by mental » Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:02 am
Slightly different procedure

clearly I and II alone are insufficient

we have to find whether d1/r1 > d2/r2

given from I: d1=d2 + 30
from II: r1 = r2 + 30

d1/r1 = (d2 + 30) / (r2 + 30)
muliply and divide by r2 = (d2r2 + 30r2)/(r2*(r2+30))

d2/r2 = mutiply and divide by (r2+30)
(d2r2 + 30d2)/(r2*(r2+30))

now we have to compare the numerators of the fractions

d2r2 + 30r2 > d2r2 + 30d2
so it boils down to the comparision between
d2 and r2...................or (d1 and r1)

we dont have any info on this ......so E