BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

jets

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:03 pm
E is a correct option. reasoning is hazardous product has reduced from 90 per production worker to 40. If the no of workers are more now then the reasoning doesn't hold. so it is an assumption that in 1994 the no of passenger workers were not much less than current one...
Join the discussion

by cramya » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:01 pm
One more for E)

Negate E and the conclusion falls apart.

The production worker counts have to remain more or less the same to say the progtram has successfully achieved its goal.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:56 pm
conclusion: the program is success!!!
1994 =90 per worker

now = 40 per worker


what is worker count increases so total waste/ total worker will go down ieven if the total waste remains the same.


IMO E
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by graem83d » Fri May 13, 2016 3:34 am
I still feel E should be the answer
Join the discussion