BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

jets

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:03 pm
E is a correct option. reasoning is hazardous product has reduced from 90 per production worker to 40. If the no of workers are more now then the reasoning doesn't hold. so it is an assumption that in 1994 the no of passenger workers were not much less than current one...
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:01 pm
One more for E)

Negate E and the conclusion falls apart.

The production worker counts have to remain more or less the same to say the progtram has successfully achieved its goal.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:56 pm
conclusion: the program is success!!!
1994 =90 per worker

now = 40 per worker


what is worker count increases so total waste/ total worker will go down ieven if the total waste remains the same.


IMO E
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:00 am

by graem83d » Fri May 13, 2016 3:34 am
I still feel E should be the answer
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1