1) INSUFF: we do not know anything about the sequence
X2=X1/2 and so on .. Just gives us the formula of terms in the sequence
2) gives relationship of X4 and X5 : INSUFF
Combine
X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and from 1 we get X5=X4/2
2 equations we can solve and hence on further calculation using 1 we can get X1
Hence C
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
sequence
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
IMO E
after combining we get
X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
after combining we get
X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Answer is C only.
If you read the question properly, it says, sequence of positive numbers x1,x2,x3,.... and not positive integers.
If you read the question properly, it says, sequence of positive numbers x1,x2,x3,.... and not positive integers.
I think I am getting all confused here..sreak1089 wrote:Answer is C only.
If you read the question properly, it says, sequence of positive numbers x1,x2,x3,.... and not positive integers.
are fractions numbers??
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Yes fractions are very much numbers and by all means.
But fractions are NOT integers or whole numbers or natural numbers.
Fractions come under the definition of rational numbers.
I have given definitions below:
1) Integers: ...-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5....
2) Natural numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,..... (Set of Positive numbers only)
3) Whole numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,....(Zero + Set of Positive numbers)
4) Rational numbers: Any number that can be expressed in
the form of p/q (where q != 0) is called a rational number.
But fractions are NOT integers or whole numbers or natural numbers.
Fractions come under the definition of rational numbers.
I have given definitions below:
1) Integers: ...-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5....
2) Natural numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,..... (Set of Positive numbers only)
3) Whole numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,....(Zero + Set of Positive numbers)
4) Rational numbers: Any number that can be expressed in
the form of p/q (where q != 0) is called a rational number.
This is a common DS rule interpretation error, so it's important to understand the mistake you made.tohellandback wrote:IMO E
after combining we get
X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
In DS, the information in the statements will NEVER contradict the conditions in the stem. The conditions in the stem may limit which numbers you are allowed to pick, but there will always be at least one number that satisfies both the stem and the statements.
So, if you end up with a seeming contradiction (i.e. no possible number), it does not mean that the answer is E - it means that you have made a mistake somewhere along the way.
Answer "E" states that the statements are insufficient to answer the question, not that there is no possible answer. Since there's no answer choice that reflects "there is no possible value for x", that's not a possible result of the exercise.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
i got to x5=x4/2 but i couldn't see how to get x1.... dat's why i ended up choosng E... how can we get to x1?
thanks Stuart, I understand now. I hope I will remember that during the testStuart Kovinsky wrote:This is a common DS rule interpretation error, so it's important to understand the mistake you made.tohellandback wrote:IMO E
after combining we get
X5=(X4)/(X4+1)
and X5=X4/2
this X4=1 and X5=1/2 this contradictory to the condition that the given sequence contains positive numbers.
In DS, the information in the statements will NEVER contradict the conditions in the stem. The conditions in the stem may limit which numbers you are allowed to pick, but there will always be at least one number that satisfies both the stem and the statements.
So, if you end up with a seeming contradiction (i.e. no possible number), it does not mean that the answer is E - it means that you have made a mistake somewhere along the way.
Answer "E" states that the statements are insufficient to answer the question, not that there is no possible answer. Since there's no answer choice that reflects "there is no possible value for x", that's not a possible result of the exercise.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!












