Length of BC

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: India

by RCV » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:12 am
adi_800 wrote:If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

(1) BD = 6 rt3

(2) x = 60

great question, IMO E
MBA admissions in leading universities of USA, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Dubai.
Contact details: (+91)522-2200123 (+91)9369336687
Email: [email protected]
Located at Lucknow, India

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:14 am
adi_800 wrote:If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

(1) BD = 6 rt3

(2) x = 60

[1] In triangle BCD, CD = 6, DB = 6 √3, and angle BDC = 30º. Now, come what may, BC could also be found out uniquely. Sufficient

[2] In triangle BCD, CD = 6, angle BDC = 30º, and angle BCD = 120º. Now, come what may, BC could also be found out uniquely. Sufficient


[spoiler]D[/spoiler]
Last edited by sanju09 on Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:18 am
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times

by sumit.sinha » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:27 am
adi_800 wrote:If CD = 6, what is the length of BC?

(1) BD = 6 rt3

(2) x = 60

My Explanation:

Draw a perpendicular line from B to AC, which will intersect line AC at E.
Let BC = a, EC = b and EB = c

(1)
in the triangle BED, it is a 30:60:90 triangle. Hence the sides are in the ratio 1x : xrt3 : 2x
as 2x = 6rt3.
therefore, x = 3 rt3

Hence, EB = c = x = 3rt3
EC = b = ED - CD = xrt3 - 6 = (3 rt 3 * rt3) - 6 = 9-6 = 3

Now in the triangle BEC, using Pythagoras theorem,
a^2 = b^2 + c^2
i.e a = 6
SUFFICIENT

(2)
In the triangle BEC, It is a 30:60:90 triangle. Hence the sides are in the ratio 1x : xrt3 : 2x
as 2x = a
therefore x = a/2
b will become, b =a/2
and c =(a/2) rt3

Now in triangle BED, again it is a 30:60:90 triangle. Hence the sides are in the ratio 1y : yrt3 : 2y [ taking variable y so as not to get confused between the earlier x and this y]
as side ED is opposite to angle 60. therefore, yrt3 = (a/2) + 6
i.e. y = (((a/2)+6)/ rt3)

Also as side EB is opposite to angle 30, so y = (a/2) rt 3

equating both ys,
(((a/2)+6)/ rt3) = (a/2) rt 3
solving, we get a =6
SUFFICIENT

Therefore CORRECT ANSWER (D)

Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:17 am
Aditya Bhai

This is not the difficult problem. I can select D without solving.

Statement 1:
you know two sides and included angle; so you can find other sides and angles by applying cosine or sine formula.

Statement 2:
angle BDC = angle CBD = 30 degree

DC = BC = 6

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 12:23 pm
Location: Newyork
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:3 members

by selfmade » Sat Sep 18, 2010 5:17 pm
IMO D
----------
Aiming for 780

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by anantbhatia » Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:55 pm
Need a clarification over here.

(1) definitely only one way to draw a triangle with the given two sides and included angle. So surely, one can determine the length by drawing the triangle and measuring its side. Is that sufficient? Or does sufficiency means that the required has to be derived mathematically?

(2) same as above. Sufficient by drawing, but mathematically not sure.

Can some expert answer this query? It is more of a basic doubt about DS rather than about this question.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:41 am
Thanked: 7 times

by gmat1011 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:07 pm
In the question is X = 60 supposed to be the measure of the angle BCA or length of the side AC?

Its not clear... if its the angle measure - which is what I thought it was - then (2) is easily sufficient -- cause then you can prove that the triangle is isoceles..

Statement 1 also seems sufficient as 2 sides and included angle are fixed...