I have a general question. Is zero a multiple of all numbers?
I think it is a multiple. Even according to the following website it is https://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60913.html.
However, if 0 is a multiple of all numbers why don't we consider it while calculating LCMs. Shouldn't 0 be the LCM of every number?
Thanks for your help
LCM
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
- Thanked: 331 times
- Followed by:11 members
I think it has to do with the definition of LCM i.e. the norm is to take a non zero positive number.Just like when we say squrae root of a real number we consider the prinicipal square root (non negative root) of that number
Like u say if this was not the case then 0 wouldbe the LCM for any 2 numbers, I am sure the experts here can provide more info but I will also see if I can find anything on this.
Like u say if this was not the case then 0 wouldbe the LCM for any 2 numbers, I am sure the experts here can provide more info but I will also see if I can find anything on this.