Last year, 'Crazy Matt's Electronics' earned 90% more than

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 2505
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 1:50 pm
Followed by:6 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Source: Economist GMAT

Last year, 'Crazy Matt's Electronics' earned 90% more than did 'Sane Dan Plumbing'. Are Matt's earnings this year higher than Dan's last year's earnings?

1) Dan earned 735,123 dollars last year.
2) Matt earned 50% less than he did last year.

The OA is B
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:01 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorLU wrote:Source: Economist GMAT

Last year, 'Crazy Matt's Electronics' earned 90% more than did 'Sane Dan Plumbing'. Are Matt's earnings this year higher than Dan's last year's earnings?

1) Dan earned 735,123 dollars last year.
2) Matt earned 50% less than he did last year.

The OA is B
Say, Sane Dan Plumbing' last year earning = $x, thus, Crazy Matt's Electronics' last year earning = $1.9x.

We have to find out whether Matt's earnings this year higher than Dan's last year's earnings (= x).

Let's take each statement one by one.

1) Dan earned 735,123 dollars last year.

=> x = $735,123. Insufficient.

2) Matt earned 50% less than he did last year.

=> Matt's earnings this year = 50% of 1.9x = $0.95x

Since Matt's earnings this year (= $0.95x) is NOT higher than Dan's last year's earnings (= $x), the answer is No. Sufficient.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review

Locations: Manhattan Review Bangalore | GMAT Prep Chennai | GRE Prep Himayatnagar | Hyderabad GRE Coaching | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.