BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Problem - Totally clueless

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by puneetdua » Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:59 am
Ans shd be B - Coz

1) |x-3| >=y

IF y =2 then x can be 5 or 6
Not sufficient

2) |x-3| <= -y

we are already given y>=0
IF we take y >= 1 then the condition given in 2) doesnt hold true
e.g. -> y = 1
|x-3| <= -1 -----> cant be coz of modulus

So we need to take y = 0
and if we take y=0 then there is a ceratin value of x

hence B

Good question indeed...!!
Thanks
Puneet
Join the discussion

by pseudonym » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:00 am
Hey, that was pretty simple! And I sweated my brains out breaking the modulus sign and coming up with all sorts of inequalities. Thanks man!
Join the discussion

by pseudonym » Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:03 am
Need some suggestions here. Should I rather substitute random values into modulus problems to figure out the solution or break it up into inequalities? Or is it essentially a case by case scenario?
Join the discussion

by missrochelle » Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:23 pm
puneetdua wrote:Ans shd be B - Coz

1) |x-3| >=y

IF y =2 then x can be 5 or 6
Not sufficient

2) |x-3| <= -y

we are already given y>=0
IF we take y >= 1 then the condition given in 2) doesnt hold true
e.g. -> y = 1
|x-3| <= -1 -----> cant be coz of modulus

So we need to take y = 0
and if we take y=0 then there is a ceratin value of x

hence B

Good question indeed...!!
how do you know on this inequality to plug #s instead of trying to get fancy and manipulate the equalities? i.e. test positive/negative case?
Join the discussion

by missrochelle » Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:23 pm
puneetdua wrote:Ans shd be B - Coz

1) |x-3| >=y

IF y =2 then x can be 5 or 6
Not sufficient

2) |x-3| <= -y

we are already given y>=0
IF we take y >= 1 then the condition given in 2) doesnt hold true
e.g. -> y = 1
|x-3| <= -1 -----> cant be coz of modulus

So we need to take y = 0
and if we take y=0 then there is a ceratin value of x

hence B

Good question indeed...!!
how do you know on this inequality to plug #s instead of trying to get fancy and manipulate the equalities? i.e. test positive/negative case?
Join the discussion