Critical Reasoning

I got this one correct but took a while. I still don't even think that the answer choice is a good answer. Although it is the least worst. Would love to hear some discussion why I am wrong.

Note: There is a similar question to this with very similar wordings. However, they are entirely two different questions. The conclusion is different and the answer choices are different.

graduate salary > non graduate salary... so people are getting enrolled in hugh numbers ..so graduates are more

Opinion: Did all the people who got enrolled has passed out successfully??

1) One degree is enough.. this more degrees is excess talk ..out
2) keep this open..matching my opinion
3) Other countries...this is out of scope
4) passage never mentioned that all jobs are for grads.
5) Not bad keep this open

Here 2>5 because "enrollment is more so outcome is more" ... 5 uses "have had" employers are troubled in past now they are finding grads with ease... 5 is a strengthner...

Please post your comments on 5...

1] Talking about more than 1 college degree is Out of scope .
2] This option correctly tells us the flaw that may be more students are getting enrolled but are all of them passing out . Thus weakens the argument.
3]We are not concerned about the increase or decrease in % of polulation .
4]Irrelevant
5]Irrelevant

IMO B.

Hi AIM,

Is 5 a strengthner??

HSPA wrote:Hi AIM,

Is 5 a strengthner??

I dont think that it is strengthening the argument b'coz it says that for many years , employers had difficulty , it doesnt mention that they are now able to find enough collage grads .