Og 10 is wrong

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:760

Og 10 is wrong

by magnus opus » Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:23 am
53. There is no consensus on what role. if any, is played by acid rain in slowing the growth or damaging forests
in the eastern United States.
(A) slowing the growth or damaging
(B) the damage or the slowing of the growth of
(C) the damage to or the slowness of the growth of
(D) damaged or slowed growth of
(E) damaging or slowing the growth of

The correct answer is E.

however, since damaging and slowing are linked by "or" either verb can take the sentence that follows.
so, if the sentence is broken it can be read as:-

There is no consensus on what role. if any, is played by acid rain in damaging the growth of forests
in the eastern United States.

which is clearly illogical as growth is not tangible so it cant be damaged-though it can be hampered but thats not relevant here.

Hence the sentence is clearly ambiguous.

C on the other hand changes the intent slightly but is grammatically perfect.

If you have a logical explanation of why E is correct. please share.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:46 am
Option E is correct.

The sentence can be rephrased as,

what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests

Here parallelism is maintained properly and preposition "of" is needed.
--Anand--

Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:6 members

by niksworth » Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:40 am
Selango's explanation is perfect. You spotted the wrong elements for parallelism.

And be careful while declaring that any OG answer is wrong. Not the easiest of tasks.
scio me nihil scire

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:760

by magnus opus » Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:58 am
I agree with you on how you have shown parallel elements.

however, doesnt the other illogical parallelism also exist?

In my opinon its thus results in ambiguity

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:760

by magnus opus » Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:01 am
selango wrote:Option E is correct.

The sentence can be rephrased as,

what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests

Here parallelism is maintained properly and preposition "of" is needed.
I am not denying that this is possibility, However the other parallel explanation can also exist so it makes it unclear for the reader.

• Page 1 of 1