BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

When people evade

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:13 pm
source:--Knewton-prep

When people evade fares on public transportation systems, they begin a vicious cycle. Fare evasion results in lost revenue, which forces local governments to raise public transportation fares, which raises the public transportation costs for those who use the public transportation and who do not evade fares. This, in turn, encourages even more people to evade fares.

The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true?


(A) An increase in public transportation fares is an incentive for commuters to buy bulk transportation passes at a discount.

(B) Some methods for catching fare evaders may save the transportation system more money in lost fare evasions than they cost, but their success rate is variable.

(C) Public transportation users who routinely evade paying fares cannot be induced to stop evading fares through a reduction of fares unless the penalties for fare evasion are simultaneously increased.

(D) When local governments initially set public transportation prices designed to raise a certain amount of revenue, they do not factor in the costs of fare evasion.

(E) The fare amount that will induce a rider to begin evading fares is the same for all public transportation users.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by boazkhan » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:44 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by abhi0697 » Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:01 pm
IMO D.
Local government will increase fare after evasion only if initially they have not factored this amount while setting public transportation prices.
Join the discussion

by cyrwr1 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 am
D, there is a similar question in one of the OG's I believe regarding tax evaders.
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:10 am
CONCLUSION: Evading fares = vicious cycle (more people will evade fares)

EVIDENCE: Evading fares = lost revenue = raise fares = higher cost to public

ASSUMPTIONS: Each step must lead to the next; there can be no other solution. The gov't must raise fares. The higher fares must cause more fare evasion.

QUESTION REPHRASE: What must happen for the conclusion to work?

PREDICTION: Anything that continues to link evading fares to MORE people evading fares.

A - This would weaken the argument.
B - If the success rate is "variable" it doesn't help or hurt.
C - How does this lead to MORE people evading fares?
D - CORRECT. This strengthens the link in the cycle.
E - Irrelevant.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:55 am
OA is indeed D guys
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:17 pm
the vicious cycles is happening because of the revenue lost due to fare evading.

D brings out this reasoning.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion