The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter:
"The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion
The argument states that Workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false. The author provides evidence in support by stating that 79 percent of nearly 1200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires showed interest in topics related to the management issues such as corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs.
Firstly, the evidence provided by the author focuses only upon two areas of management issues.there are numerous management related issues such as hiring employees, production, research and development, product distribution and promotion etc.
Hence, the above two mentioned categories are not sufficient to draw conclusion that employees have a high level of interest in corporate issues.
Furthermore, workers are generally interested in topics that benefit them. The topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefit programs interests the workers since it is going to have a potential impact on their job and affect their pay.
In addition to the above mentioned, the argument doesn't clearly mention whether the respondents to the survey were representatives of workers. For instance the survey may have been distributed disproportionately to group other than the workers such as managers and other high level employees of the organization.
The argument above has significant weaknesses. It would be useful if the author includes a sample response of various other levels of management considering other diverse topics would in fact help in determining whether the argument is valid.
"The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion
The argument states that Workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false. The author provides evidence in support by stating that 79 percent of nearly 1200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires showed interest in topics related to the management issues such as corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs.
Firstly, the evidence provided by the author focuses only upon two areas of management issues.there are numerous management related issues such as hiring employees, production, research and development, product distribution and promotion etc.
Hence, the above two mentioned categories are not sufficient to draw conclusion that employees have a high level of interest in corporate issues.
Furthermore, workers are generally interested in topics that benefit them. The topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefit programs interests the workers since it is going to have a potential impact on their job and affect their pay.
In addition to the above mentioned, the argument doesn't clearly mention whether the respondents to the survey were representatives of workers. For instance the survey may have been distributed disproportionately to group other than the workers such as managers and other high level employees of the organization.
The argument above has significant weaknesses. It would be useful if the author includes a sample response of various other levels of management considering other diverse topics would in fact help in determining whether the argument is valid.
