BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Khalil drove 120 kilometers in a certain amount of time.

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Dec 12, 2019 12:44 am
Khalil drove 120 kilometers in a certain amount of time. What was his average speed, in kilometers per hour, during this time?

(1) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 5 kilometers per hour faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20 minutes.
(2) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 25% faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20%.


OA A

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:42 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Khalil drove 120 kilometers in a certain amount of time. What was his average speed, in kilometers per hour, during this time?

(1) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 5 kilometers per hour faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20 minutes.
(2) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 25% faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20%.

OA A

Source: Official Guide
Say Khalil drove 120 kilometers in x hours. Thus, the average speed = 120/x kmpl. We have to get the value of 120/x.

Thus, if we get the value of x, we get the answer.

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 5 kilometers per hour faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20 minutes.

120 / (120/x + 5) = 60x - 20
6x / (120 + 5x) = 3x - 1
15x^2 + 349x - 120 = 0

Since this is a quadratic equation, x would have two values and we have to get the unique value of x. But solving this quadratic equation is challenging. However, observing closely we find that the two split parts of 349x must be equal to 15x^2 * (- 120), i.e. a negative number. Thus, one of the two split parts of 349x must be negative and the other positive, yielding one value of x as negative and the other positive. Since x cannot be negative, we would have only one positive value of x. Thus, this equation would ensure a unique value of 120/x. Sufficient.

(2) If Khalil had driven at an average speed that was 25% faster, his driving time would have been reduced by 20%.

=> Speed increases to 125% = 125/100 = 5/4, thus, time would reduce to reciprocal of 5/4 = 4/5 = 80%. Or, the driving time would reduce by 20%.

This is not new information. Thus, Statement 2 is insufficient.

The correct answer: A

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GRE Prep

Locations: GRE Classes Seattle | GMAT Prep Course Hong Kong | GRE Prep San Francisco | SAT Prep Classes NYC | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion