Ps- It was time consuming

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:9 members

by sureshbala » Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:21 am
Let the population of the least district be x.

Now the maximum population of any other district is 110%(x).

Now x will be minimum if the population of the rest of the districts is maximum.

Hence for x to be minimum the population of each of the other 10 districts must be 110%(x).

Given that x + 10[110%(X)]= 132,000
i.e 12x = 132,000.
x=11,000

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:32 am
Thanked: 16 times

by x2suresh » Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:45 am
sureshbala wrote:Let the population of the least district be x.

Now the maximum population of any other district is 110%(x).

Now x will be minimum if the population of the rest of the districts is maximum.

Hence for x to be minimum the population of each of the other 10 districts must be 110%(x).

Given that x + 10[110%(X)]= 132,000
i.e 12x = 132,000.
x=11,000
Agree with you.

Nice work

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:29 am
Thanked: 3 times

by ven4gmat » Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:38 am
sureshbala wrote:Let the population of the least district be x.

Now the maximum population of any other district is 110%(x).

Now x will be minimum if the population of the rest of the districts is maximum.

Hence for x to be minimum the population of each of the other 10 districts must be 110%(x).

Given that x + 10[110%(X)]= 132,000
i.e 12x = 132,000.
x=11,000
ohh...you made it seem simple to me man...initially i was also a bit confused to tackle this question..