(c) is grammatically incorrect.
the construction (preposition) + NOUN + VERBing is WRONG, unless the preposition refers directly to the NOUN. (that isn't usually the case, so, if you're in doubt, you should strike choices with this sort of construction.)
the rationale is that "no comma + VERBing" is a modifier that modifies the preceding noun, and so is ineligible to be the object of that preposition.
for instance:
i've never heard of bees stinging dogs
WRONG. this is not an issue of whether you've heard of bees themselves; it's an issue of whether you've heard of their stinging dogs.
in this sentence, the object of "heard of" is "bees", even though you intend it to be "stinging", so this sentence is incorrect.
i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
CORRECT. this time, the picture is actually of my cousin -- who, as the modifier says, happens to be playing hockey -- so we're good.
--
in this problem:
"resulting in the welfare program now costing..." is incorrect, since the object of "resulting in" is supposed to be the fact that the program costs more, not the program itself.
the construction (preposition) + NOUN + VERBing is WRONG, unless the preposition refers directly to the NOUN. (that isn't usually the case, so, if you're in doubt, you should strike choices with this sort of construction.)
the rationale is that "no comma + VERBing" is a modifier that modifies the preceding noun, and so is ineligible to be the object of that preposition.
for instance:
i've never heard of bees stinging dogs
WRONG. this is not an issue of whether you've heard of bees themselves; it's an issue of whether you've heard of their stinging dogs.
in this sentence, the object of "heard of" is "bees", even though you intend it to be "stinging", so this sentence is incorrect.
i have a picture of my cousin playing hockey.
CORRECT. this time, the picture is actually of my cousin -- who, as the modifier says, happens to be playing hockey -- so we're good.
--
in this problem:
"resulting in the welfare program now costing..." is incorrect, since the object of "resulting in" is supposed to be the fact that the program costs more, not the program itself.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron












