kaplan question

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:24 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

kaplan question

by jamesk486 » Sat Jun 02, 2007 8:53 am
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______.
A.more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
B.the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
C.there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
D.some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
E.some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has

i was thinking of b...

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

by jayhawk2001 » Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:32 pm
Statement 1: More tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown

Statement 2: more tourists stay in largest hotel in Harringstown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield

If both above are true, then Royal Arms Hotel cannot be the only hotel
in Springfield (as it would violate Statement 1).

B for me

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 11:51 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by rocky » Wed Jun 06, 2007 2:06 am
Clearly B is the answer as only thing wrong can we more people are rushing to other hotels(except) the big one in Springfield than to Harriston's hotel ..
Getting into it

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:51 am
Thanked: 1 times

by 800GMAT » Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:04 pm
Agree with B...OA pls

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:41 am
Location: bangalore

by hedonistatbreak » Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:02 pm
B for sure .. :)

Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by ssgmatter » Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:43 pm
please explain this question with full reasoning and explanation...

I think C should be the correct one for this

Regards,
Phil

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 9:08 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:610

by scholardream » Wed May 02, 2012 9:59 am
Premise 1: Tourists in Springfield > Tourists in Harristown
Premise 2: Tourists in Largest hotel in Harristown > Tourists in Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield
Premise 3: Both are true
Paradox: my expected answer is that the there're more hotels larger than Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield in order to make the total number of Touriests in Springfield > No of Touriest in Harristown.
Therefore, C is my answer

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:720

by ice_rush » Thu May 03, 2012 1:33 pm
the answer should be (B).