BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

kaplan question

Expert replies
by jamesk486 » Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:45 am
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80% of the potential donors they contacted. THis sucess rate, exceptionally high for univeersity fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. On the contrary, since people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base. The high sucess rate shows unsufficient canvassing effort.
Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A. Smithtown University's fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other univeristies in their contacts with such people.
B. This year the avg. size of the donations to Smithtown Univ. from new donors when the univ.'s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university's fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E. More than half the money raised by Smithtown Univ.'s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the universit.

why A??/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Cybermusings » Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:52 am
the argument states that even though 80% of potential donors were converted, it doesn't reflect too well on the ability of the fund-raisers.

This is a clearly a contradiction.

D&E can be eliminated since they strengthen the case that it was the fund-raisers who made the exercise successful

C- It does not strengthen/weaken the argument. Hence eliminate

B- Same flaw as D

A-this explains logically why the fund-raisers did not deserve much credit. It benchmarks the performance of the Smithtown univ with other colleges/univs
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorRO » Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:25 pm
Can the expert provide a detailed explanation to this question. I have been trailing this question for some weeks now and none of the expert could attend to this long time post. Thanks to the solution provider above but i would prefer a compact explanation from the expert as to why option A is consider as a better option to others ( esp. option C).

Thanks
Join the discussion