BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Kaplan Premier--Q35--The Laysan Rail

Expert replies
by newera » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:04 am
Hi everyone! Can you please explain your reasoning for choosing your answer for the following question:

The Laysan Rail, an insectivore bird once present on several of the Hawaiian Islands, can no longer be found and is thought to be extinct. Scientists originally thought that a decrease in the amount of ground vegetation available for nesting was responsible for the decline of the bird. However, they now believe that increase competition for food was ultimately responsible for the Layson Rail's inability to survive.

Which of the following would best help to account for the change in the accepted explanation for the Laysan Rail's extinction?

(A) The vegetation on the Laysan Rail's home island was decimated when rabbits were introduced to the island in the 1910s.
(B) When attempts were made to relocate the Laysan Rail to other islands, the birds lost the geographical cues that they relied on for fijnding mating sites.
(C) The Laysan Rail builds nests under dense ground cover to protect the eggs.
(D) An increase in the use of pesticides resulted in a decrease in the numbers of flies and moths present in the Laysan Rail's territory.
(E) Many species nested in the same types of vegetation as the Laysan Rail.

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albertrahul » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:13 am
IMO E.

It supports both, final conclusion that "increase competition for food was ultimately responsible for the Layson Rail's inability to survive" along with original thought that "decrease in the amount of ground vegetation available for nesting was responsible for the decline of the bird".

If many species nest in the same type of vegetation as this bird then there will be fight for space for nesting and there will be shortage of food as well.
Join the discussion

by agent47 » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:51 am
I think D
Join the discussion

by senthil » Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:26 am
my pick is E
Join the discussion

by Paddy1234 » Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:36 am
I go with D..

two things here:

a)Scientists originally thought that a decrease in the amount of ground vegetation available for nesting
b)However, they now believe that increase competition for food was ultimately responsible for the Layson Rail's inability to survive

A This addresses point A
B Ou of scope
C Out fo scope
DTalks about decrease in the food available - best help to account for the change in the accepted explanation - The competition could be between Layson Rail s for access to this reduced food
E any species nested in the same types of vegetation as the Laysan Rail
- This indicates that many species nested , but never an indication if they were competiting against Layson Rail s for the same food...

Confused between D & E i go with D...
Target 750
Join the discussion

by newera » Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:21 am
thanks for your responses!

the OA is in fact D.

this is indeed a tricky one.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Wed May 11, 2016 12:40 am
Option D looks good than other answers
Join the discussion

by hussein360 » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:35 am
newera wrote:Hi everyone! Can you please explain your reasoning for choosing your answer for the following question:

The Laysan Rail, an insectivore bird once present on several of the Hawaiian Islands, can no longer be found and is thought to be extinct. Scientists originally thought that a decrease in the amount of ground vegetation available for nesting was responsible for the decline of the bird. However, they now believe that increase competition for food was ultimately responsible for the Layson Rail's inability to survive.

Which of the following would best help to account for the change in the accepted explanation for the Laysan Rail's extinction?

(A) The vegetation on the Laysan Rail's home island was decimated when rabbits were introduced to the island in the 1910s.
(B) When attempts were made to relocate the Laysan Rail to other islands, the birds lost the geographical cues that they relied on for fijnding mating sites.
(C) The Laysan Rail builds nests under dense ground cover to protect the eggs.
(D) An increase in the use of pesticides resulted in a decrease in the numbers of flies and moths present in the Laysan Rail's territory.
(E) Many species nested in the same types of vegetation as the Laysan Rail.

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by EconomistGMATTutor » Mon Oct 23, 2017 5:19 am
The conclusion: Increased competition for food was ultimately responsible for the Layson Rail's inability to survive.

Evidence: None given.

Since no evidence is given for the new explanation, providing some will strengthen the conclusion. That's what we're asked to do here.

Choice D directly states that food is a problem. With fewer flies and moths, this known insectivore is in trouble.

A number of people asked about Choice E. First, this is a poorly-written statement. Species of what? In any case, whatever the species, we have no way of knowing that it competes with the Laysan Rail.

Note: One student wrote that Choice E supported the conclusion (it doesn't) as well as the older explanation. We have no interest in supporting the older explanation. Read the question carefully!
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Join the discussion