BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT Prep Question

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by aks19 » Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:27 am
Interesting question.

I think the only problem in E is the extra "coma" which creates sentence fragment.
Join the discussion

by Vasudha » Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:34 pm
'E' seems correct in every aspect. It also uses comma and the coordinating conjunction "but" appropriately to avoid a fragment.

I dont know what have I missed. Is there still any other reason that 'E' is wrong...
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:33 pm
Strange about C. I have seen writers use "not only X but Y" in the real world but it's rare - and I have never seen the test do that.

E technically breaks the idiom too, though. It says

"were not only able to... but they were also able to..."

Correct usage should be "were not only X but also Y"

If I had had to choose on this one, I'd probably have gone with E also. You should email them and ask! (And let us know if they reply!)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by gkammaje » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:27 pm
This is an old GMAT PREP question.... Any thoughts on this? :roll:
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:17 am
Since I first posted (wow - almost 2 years ago now!), I have seen the test use the "not only X but Y" setup (omitting the "also"), so the GMAT writers apparently think this idiom is an acceptable alternative. As such, I would've been wrong in picking E. Both C and E contain acceptable idioms, but E breaks parallelism and C doesn't... so C wins.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by Umar82 » Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:08 pm
Thanks Stacey,

BTW what "breaks" the parallel structure in "E". Is it the "they were" between the "but also" that creates the false structure?

I guess a corrected version would be: "were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but also to create . . "??
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:00 am
You've got it!

In a double idiom (not only X but Y), the part before the idiom starts (so before "not only") must apply equally to both X and Y. We've got:

Scientists were not only X (able to...) but Y (they were also...).

Scientists were able to blah blah blah. That's okay.
Scientists were they were also able to. That's not okay.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1