GMAT Prep Question

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:24 am
Location: Notre Dame
Thanked: 1 times

GMAT Prep Question

by Vasudha » Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:36 am
Is this some kind of a software error? 'C' clearly violates the idiom "not only...but also"..!!
Attachments
untitled.JPG

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:58 am

by aks19 » Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:27 am
Interesting question.

I think the only problem in E is the extra "coma" which creates sentence fragment.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:24 am
Location: Notre Dame
Thanked: 1 times

by Vasudha » Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:34 pm
'E' seems correct in every aspect. It also uses comma and the coordinating conjunction "but" appropriately to avoid a fragment.

I dont know what have I missed. Is there still any other reason that 'E' is wrong...

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:33 pm
Strange about C. I have seen writers use "not only X but Y" in the real world but it's rare - and I have never seen the test do that.

E technically breaks the idiom too, though. It says

"were not only able to... but they were also able to..."

Correct usage should be "were not only X but also Y"

If I had had to choose on this one, I'd probably have gone with E also. You should email them and ask! (And let us know if they reply!)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:32 am
Location: Phoenix
Thanked: 1 times

by gkammaje » Tue Feb 17, 2009 12:27 pm
This is an old GMAT PREP question.... Any thoughts on this? :roll:

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:17 am
Since I first posted (wow - almost 2 years ago now!), I have seen the test use the "not only X but Y" setup (omitting the "also"), so the GMAT writers apparently think this idiom is an acceptable alternative. As such, I would've been wrong in picking E. Both C and E contain acceptable idioms, but E breaks parallelism and C doesn't... so C wins.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:41 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Umar82 » Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:08 pm
Thanks Stacey,

BTW what "breaks" the parallel structure in "E". Is it the "they were" between the "but also" that creates the false structure?

I guess a corrected version would be: "were not only able to transform the gas into a solid, but also to create . . "??

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:00 am
You've got it!

In a double idiom (not only X but Y), the part before the idiom starts (so before "not only") must apply equally to both X and Y. We've got:

Scientists were not only X (able to...) but Y (they were also...).

Scientists were able to blah blah blah. That's okay.
Scientists were they were also able to. That's not okay.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me