BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

kaplan 800 question

Expert replies
by kandelaki » Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:54 pm
if -1/2<or equal to x<or equal to-1/3
and -1/4<or equal to y< or equal to -1/5


which is the minimum value of xy^2 ?

choices
-1/75
-1/50
-1/48
-1/32
-1/16

the explanation says that the minimum value means farthest from 0. thats true , yes. however i believe farthest from 0 we achive by taking lowest possibilies of x and y ( that is 1/3 form x and 1/5 from y) and get -1/75 as answerr
but the official answer they took was 1/2 and 1/4 and got -1/32
i am all confused here

please help
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by banona » Fri Feb 23, 2007 2:56 pm
Hi,
Personnally, when manipulating inequatlities of negative numbers I convet them to inequalties of positive numbers to make them regular and easy to treat;

Fo this one,I would take the positive number (-x) which would be 1/3 < -x < 1/2

I would consider y^2 as the same of (-y)^2 and get,
1/25 < y^2 < 1/16 as 1/5 <-y < 1/4

then, the product -xy^2 as a positive number, would fit the following inequality : 1/75 < -xy^2 < 1/32

Now, it's easy to get xy^2 inequality as follows:

-1/32 < xy^2< -1/75


it's then obvious that the minimum value of xy^2 is -1/32

I hope I am right
I appologize for my Frenchy-English.
I am working on it.
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sat Feb 24, 2007 8:54 am
For min and max values question, it is important to know the sign of
the end-result.

In this case, we know that the xy^2 will be negative. So, minimum
value of xy^2 will have to be a number which is farther away from zero.
(A simple example would be to compare -1 and -3, -3 is the minimum since it is farther away from 0 compared to -1.)

So, min (xy^2) is in essence min (x) * max (y^2) which yields
-1/2 * 1/16 = -1/32. Please note that we can split min (xy^2) as
above only because we already know what the sign of the
end result will be.
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:00 pm
Also, just FYI - this might be what is messing you up:

-75 is further from zero than -32.

BUT -1/75 is closer to zero than -1/32.

Think about two fractions that are much easier to understand: -1/2 and -1/3. Which one is closer to zero? -1/3. And that has the larger number in the denominator.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by kandelaki » Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:47 am
Oh, :o now i get it! thanks Stacey!!
Join the discussion