BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Judges CR

Expert replies
by varunkh70 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:15 pm
Request you please explain elimination of incorrect answers

9. Civil trials often involve great complexities that are
beyond the capacities of jurors to understand. As a
result, jurors' decisions in such trials are frequently
incorrect. Justice would therefore be better served if
the more complex trials were decided by judges
rather than juries.

The argument above depends on which of the
following assumptions?
(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
(B) The judges who would decide complex civil
trials would be better able to understand the
complexities of those trials than jurors are.
(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.
(E) The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:42 pm
Is the answer "B" ?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

Re: Judges CR

by sudi760mba » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:01 am
I would think it is B for the following reasons:

Civil Trials involve complexity which is beyond the comprehension of jurors. Assumption: It would be within the comprehension level of judges.
Jurors Lack of understanding => incorrect decisions.
Judge understand => correct decisions.

(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
Majority seems extreme. The passage doesn't even suggest that.

(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
Nothing in the passage suggests that. There's isn't any evidence to suggest that a subsect of judges would even do such a thing. Beyond what is stated.

(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.

Nothing in the passage suggests that. Goes beyond the scope of the argument.

The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.

This contradicts what was stated earlier.
varunkh70 wrote:Request you please explain elimination of incorrect answers

9. Civil trials often involve great complexities that are
beyond the capacities of jurors to understand. As a
result, jurors' decisions in such trials are frequently
incorrect. Justice would therefore be better served if
the more complex trials were decided by judges
rather than juries.

The argument above depends on which of the
following assumptions?
(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
(B) The judges who would decide complex civil
trials would be better able to understand the
complexities of those trials than jurors are.
(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.
(E) The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:34 am
IMO:B

CLEAR WINNER
Join the discussion

by varunkh70 » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:22 am
OA is B. But B seems to be mentioned directly in the argument and books say that assumptions are never stated in the argument. This is what puzzles me a bit.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:20 pm
I will Go with option B in this case.
Join the discussion