BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Judges CR

Expert replies
by varunkh70 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:15 pm
Request you please explain elimination of incorrect answers

9. Civil trials often involve great complexities that are
beyond the capacities of jurors to understand. As a
result, jurors' decisions in such trials are frequently
incorrect. Justice would therefore be better served if
the more complex trials were decided by judges
rather than juries.

The argument above depends on which of the
following assumptions?
(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
(B) The judges who would decide complex civil
trials would be better able to understand the
complexities of those trials than jurors are.
(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.
(E) The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by viju9162 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:42 pm
Is the answer "B" ?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

Re: Judges CR

by sudi760mba » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:01 am
I would think it is B for the following reasons:

Civil Trials involve complexity which is beyond the comprehension of jurors. Assumption: It would be within the comprehension level of judges.
Jurors Lack of understanding => incorrect decisions.
Judge understand => correct decisions.

(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
Majority seems extreme. The passage doesn't even suggest that.

(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
Nothing in the passage suggests that. There's isn't any evidence to suggest that a subsect of judges would even do such a thing. Beyond what is stated.

(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.

Nothing in the passage suggests that. Goes beyond the scope of the argument.

The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.

This contradicts what was stated earlier.
varunkh70 wrote:Request you please explain elimination of incorrect answers

9. Civil trials often involve great complexities that are
beyond the capacities of jurors to understand. As a
result, jurors' decisions in such trials are frequently
incorrect. Justice would therefore be better served if
the more complex trials were decided by judges
rather than juries.

The argument above depends on which of the
following assumptions?
(A) A majority of civil trials involve complexities
that jurors are not capable of understanding.
(B) The judges who would decide complex civil
trials would be better able to understand the
complexities of those trials than jurors are.
(C) The judges who would preside over civil trials
would disallow the most complex sorts of
evidence from being introduced into those
trials.
(D) Jurors' decisions are frequently incorrect even
in those civil trials that do not involve great
complexities.
(E) The sole reason in favor of having juries decide
civil trials is the supposition that their
decisions will almost always be correct.
Join the discussion

by sunnyjohn » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:34 am
IMO:B

CLEAR WINNER
Join the discussion

by varunkh70 » Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:22 am
OA is B. But B seems to be mentioned directly in the argument and books say that assumptions are never stated in the argument. This is what puzzles me a bit.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:20 pm
I will Go with option B in this case.
Join the discussion