BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

John and Peter

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:56 am
Thanked: 1 times
by ST » Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:41 pm
A basketball coach will select the members of a five-players team from armog 9 players, including John and Peter. If the five players are chosen at random, What is the probability that the coach chooses a team that includes both John and Peter?

a. 1/9
b. 1/6
c. 2/9
d. 5/18
e. 1/3

Answer is D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

Re: John and Peter

by dtweah » Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:13 pm
ST wrote:A basketball coach will select the members of a five-players team from armog 9 players, including John and Peter. If the five players are chosen at random, What is the probability that the coach chooses a team that includes both John and Peter?

a. 1/9
b. 1/6
c. 2/9
d. 5/18
e. 1/3

Answer is D
(2C2 x 7C3)/9C5=5/18
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:53 pm
Location: Sao Paulo-Brazil
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:660

by shibal » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:37 pm
dtweah, why did you do 2c2*7c3? i disconsidered it and got 5/18. maybe i was lucky but what is the concept behind it?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:56 am
Thanked: 1 times

by ST » Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:38 pm
could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:01 am
Location: India
Thanked: 2 times

by imhimanshu » Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:42 pm
let me explain this:
total number of outcomes=9C5 i.e selecting five persons from 9 guys
number of favourable = 7C3 since jhn and peter are already included. we need to select 3 guys out of remaing 7. i.e 7C3
so probability= 7C3/9C5 =5/18 hence D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

by dtweah » Thu Jul 09, 2009 6:06 am
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:29 pm
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:49 am
Thanked: 36 times

by dtweah » Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:11 pm
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:710

by skprocks » Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:15 pm
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:710

by skprocks » Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:17 pm
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 46 times

by outreach » Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:49 am
opposite event will be: none of them is in the team + only one of them is in the team

skprocks wrote:
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:05 am
skprocks wrote:
dtweah wrote:
real2008 wrote:
dtweah wrote:
ST wrote:could you please explain it more? How did you get 2C2 and 7C3
Sorry for delay.

Whenever you told that "JOhn and James must be included" you can treat that as a Sure EVENT. It has to happen. The probably of a Sure event is 1. Separate the sure event from the others. You have J J A B C D E F G

Probability of choosing james and john x probability choosing the other 3 after you have chosen james and John / 9C5

2/2=2C2=1 x 7C3/9C5

That is the concept behind it.
why 2C2?
The number of ways of picking two persons from among 2 persons. I said separate two groups. One group of 2 persons and another group of 7 persons. If the 2 persons must be included then you find that number of ways of selecting them is:
2C2 x number of ways of selecting 3 people from 7=7C3/9C5
That approach is fine.But when I consider the approach of 1- Negation of prob , I am not getting the expected answer.

P(John and Peter were not selected)= 7c5/9c5
And hence P(John and Peter Selected)=1-7c5/9c5=1=1-1/6=5/6 which is not any of the option.I am unable to understand.
Why this approach does not yield an answer?
The approach you're using is:

P(good outcome) = 1 - P(bad outcome)

To use this approach, we have to account for ALL the different ways to get a bad outcome:

P(not both J and P) = P(not J and not P) + P(J or P and 4 others)

P(not J and not P) = 7c5/9c5 = 1/6
P(J or P and 4 others) = 2 * 7c4/9c5 = 5/9
P(not both J and P) = 1/6 + 5/9 = 13/18

So P(both J and P) = 1 - 13/18 = 5/18.

I'd use this approach only when P(bad outcome) is easier to determine than P(good outcome). In this problem, P(good outcome) involves less math.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1