Data Sufficiency

uh ok

cool cool.

if you say so

sanju09 wrote:

So are u tryna say that the answer according to you is E ???

ajith and I are both confused

sorry crony, running short of time right now, can't check my post again, see you on our subsequent meet, till then...

IMO [spoiler]E[/spoiler]

Final the answer is C

YES Mom4MBA
the Finaly Answer is C

Obituary (Lions were not synthetic):

Does John own more shares than Mary?

Is equivalent to: Is 2 m - 400 > m, or is m > 400; YES. So YES for everything. Answered


[spoiler]CEEEE..........[/spoiler]

So , first your answer option was E
Then u claim that the answer cant be C

And now u mention the answer according to you to be CE

Interesting (( not really ))

Are you trying P n C here with ur answer options ??

sanju09 wrote:Obituary (Lions were not synthetic):

Does John own more shares than Mary?

Is equivalent to: Is 2 m - 400 > m, or is m > 400; YES. So YES for everything. Answered


[spoiler]CEEEE..........[/spoiler]

bhumika.k.shah wrote:So , first your answer option was E
Then u claim that the answer cant be C

And now u mention the answer according to you to be CE

Interesting (( not really ))

Are you trying P n C here with ur answer options ??

sanju09 wrote:Obituary (Lions were not synthetic):

Does John own more shares than Mary?

Is equivalent to: Is 2 m - 400 > m, or is m > 400; YES. So YES for everything. Answered


[spoiler]CEEEE..........[/spoiler]

What are you trying now, by the way?

Figure out what made u write weird answer options at different times


Or make you realise whether u r talkin straight!

sanju09 wrote:

bhumika.k.shah wrote:So , first your answer option was E
Then u claim that the answer cant be C

And now u mention the answer according to you to be CE

Interesting (( not really ))

Are you trying P n C here with ur answer options ??

sanju09 wrote:Obituary (Lions were not synthetic):

Does John own more shares than Mary?

Is equivalent to: Is 2 m - 400 > m, or is m > 400; YES. So YES for everything. Answered


[spoiler]CEEEE..........[/spoiler]

What are you trying now, by the way?

Figure out what made u write weird answer options at different times


Or make you realise whether u r talkin straight!

Well, Bhumika

An eye for an eye would either lead us to the world of blinds or it would take the world of blinds to us. On this forum, once a discussion is settled, we must focus on the next issue of our use instead of flying accolades till next morning. Many a time, a contradictory statement is made by a member, just in order to make sure that all aspects of the problem have been well thought-out. I personally never take that as their TRP service to the forum, factually it is must; this is why we are here for. Let's correct each other, let's help each other, andlet's wish success to each other. We are not seeking height to become kite and nullify each other's might. Terms like "tit for tat", "bickering", "what made u write weird" etc are not for us to bring into play. You post good questions, ajith's approaches to the question show that he has the valor to cross 760, all that makes the atmosphere of the forum very bubbly until we sidetrack ourselves from the good work. Keep doing the good work, people...

ATB

agree mate!

cheers!

sanju09 wrote:

Figure out what made u write weird answer options at different times


Or make you realise whether u r talkin straight!

Well, Bhumika

An eye for an eye would either lead us to the world of blinds or it would take the world of blinds to us. On this forum, once a discussion is settled, we must focus on the next issue of our use instead of flying accolades till next morning. Many a time, a contradictory statement is made by a member, just in order to make sure that all aspects of the problem have been well thought-out. I personally never take that as their TRP service to the forum, factually it is must; this is why we are here for. Let's correct each other, let's help each other, andlet's wish success to each other. We are not seeking height to become kite and nullify each other's might. Terms like "tit for tat", "bickering", "what made u write weird" etc are not for us to bring into play. You post good questions, ajith's approaches to the question show that he has the valor to cross 760, all that makes the atmosphere of the forum very bubbly until we sidetrack ourselves from the good work. Keep doing the good work, people...

ATB