BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Jason's salary

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:51 pm
Let Jason's salary be x in 1995 and Karen's salary be y in 1995.
So in 1998 their respective salaries were x+(xp/100) and y+(yp/100) or x(100+p)/100 and y(100+p)/100.
The question is asking for the value of p.
First consider statement (1) alone.
It means y-x = 2000.
Since nothing is being said about p, this information is not sufficient to answer the question.
Next consider statement (2) alone.
It means y(100+p)/100 - x(100+p)/100 = 2440 or {(100+p)/100}*(y-x) = 2440.
Again this information alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Next combine both the statements together and check.
So we get two equations.
y-x = 2000.
and {(100+p)/100}*(y-x) = 2440.
On dividing second equation by first one we get (100+p)/100 = 2440/2000.
Or 100+p = 122 or p = 22.
So both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.
The correct answer is hence (C).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:47 pm
------------------------1995------------------------- 1998
J's Salary-------------X-------------------------- X(1+.0p)

K's Salary-------------Y--------------------------- Y(1+.0p)

Statement 1 : Y - X = 2000 -> No way to find p . Insufficient

Statement 2 : Y(1+.0p) - X(1+.0p) = 2440

(1+.0p) ( Y - X ) = 2440 -> No way to find p. Insufficient

1 and 2 together,

Since, we have ( Y-X ) from eq 1. We can plug in 2 to get "p"...sufficient
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by ssuarezo » Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:11 pm
Thanks to you both guys.
Actually, it was easy, but ... I got mixed up ! ...
And Sumanr84, your links are interesting ...

Thanks for your time !
Silvia
Join the discussion

by aks16189 » Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:13 pm
Hi, both of you have explained very nicely but there is a much easier way to do this...

in 1995 let jason's salary b x so Karen is x+2000

now in 1998 both get p% increase so,
Jason= px and Karen=p(x+2000)

the diff is nw 2440 so,

p(x+2000)-px = 2440
=> px+2000p-px=2440
=>2000p=2440
=>p=1.22

and it is clear that both statements are needed to form 2 equations.
Join the discussion