BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

it isnt tough but i still didnt get it

Expert replies
by sana.noor » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:36 am
1. In the xy plane, line k passes through the point (1, 1) and line m passes through the point (1, -1). Are line m and k perpendicular to each other?


a. Lines k and m intersect at the point (1, -1)

b.Line k intersect the x -axis at the point (1,0).

OA is E
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jitsy » Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:41 pm
Line K passes through point (1,1) and M passes through (1,-1).

Draw those two points and you will realise that one is in 1st quadrant and other in 4th. This is what the question stem tells you. And the question is are the two lines perpendicular.

Statement 1:
Tells us that lines intersect at point 1,-1.
If you drawn the above two points and now you join (1,1) and (1,-1), which are the two points of line K, you will know the line K.
This line K is parallel to Y axis.
However, all we know about line M is that it passes through 1,-1. And there can be infinite such lines. We cant conclude whether the two lines are perpendicular.

So, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
This tells us that Line K passes through 1,0. Join 1,1 and 1,0. Once again you will get a line parallel to Y axis. Again if you extend this line you will realise that it will cross point 1,-1. But the situation is similar to Statement 1.

So, INSUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements only gives us line k again and we still don't know how Line m is. This we got from both statements separately as well anyway.
Join the discussion

by jitsy » Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:47 pm
Also, any two perpendicular lines will have the product of their slopes as -1.
So you can also take the question as asking 'is the product of their slopes -1 ?'

Now, we can find out the slope of a line if we know two points it passes through.

The question itself gives us one point for each line.

Statement 1 gives us another point for line k but not m
Statement 2 again gives us another point for line k but not m
Combining them, we have three points for k but only one for m.
Join the discussion