BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

It is ludicrous to assert that the manth department's new

Expert replies
by AAPL » Mon Feb 25, 2019 3:16 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Princeton Review

It is ludicrous to assert that the math department's new policy, allowing the use of nonprogrammable calculators during exams, is discriminatory. Though a calculator can be expensive, and some students will not be able to purchase one, the department is not requiring that students use one, it is only allowing them to do so if they desire. Thus, any student who does not purchase a calculator for use on his exams will not be penalized; he or she will be no worse off at exam time than he or she was prior to the policy change.

To which of the following would the opponents of the math department's new policy be most likely to refer, in an attempt to have the new policy abolished?
A. The difference in speed between a top-of-the-line calculator and a bottom-end one is significant.
B. Each individual student's performance is evaluated against the performance of his or her fellow students on math department exams.
C. The university student services department will make available to all students calculators that can be borrowed as library books are.
D. Much of the math being tested on most of the exams in question is so complex that it requires a calculator-like mind to do the necessary computations.
E. When calculators were not allowed, more than half of all students failed their math exams.

OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:15 am
Option A :- INCORRECT
Quite true, but ordinarily stating the difference in speed between a top of the line calculator and the bottom end is not enough reason to abolish the new policy of the mathematics department.

Option B :- CORRECT
The opponents of the math department's new policy are most likely refer to this option because if the students performance are evaluated against the others and it can prove that the policy does more harm than good, then the policy might be abolished.

Option C :- INCORRECT
Making available to all students calculator, that can be borrowed as library books serves as a temporary solution to help those who cant afford to buy calculator. It cannot help to abolish the maths department new policy because it only put the situation under control, it cannot eradicate the whole problem.

Option D :- INCORRECT
The argument is more concerned with the non compulsory use of calculator that might affect students then a math test that requires calculator like mind to do necessary computations, so this can't be referred to as a means of abolishing the new policy.

Option E :- INCORRECT
Perhaps, but the policy supports the use of calculator, it just happened not to be compulsory and without penalty, so the policy's opponents cannot use this to abolish the policy because it has deviated from the main course of the argument.
Join the discussion