BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Use of verb-ing modifier

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:52 pm
Thanked: 6 times

Use of verb-ing modifier

by sungoal » Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:50 pm
In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.

A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides

OA: D
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 4:06 am
Thanked: 175 times
Followed by:68 members
GMAT Score:750

by Bryant@VeritasPrep » Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:54 pm
D. is optimal. verbs in the underlined portion must be parallel.
Bryant Michaels
MBA Admissions Consultant


Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:52 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by sungoal » Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:13 pm
Bryant, could you explain why option B is wrong?
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 10:27 am

by jheshine » Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:32 pm
for providing -> changes meaning of the sentence.
the underlined portion is supposed to describe oyster farm that has two characters: sitting & providing, not sitting for providing.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Tue Sep 27, 2011 7:48 am
IMO:D
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:47 am
sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.

A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides

OA: D
When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause.
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the preceding clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.

In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:28 am
D is the ans..
B modifies FARM
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:13 am
Got a PM regarding this question. I would add the following to the expert explanation provided above:
Note the construction of the modifier in choices D and E. It is Noun + Noun Modifier and it can actually provide additional information about any specific part of the preceding clause - a zoom lens effect. You can read more about these modifiers at the link below:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=584
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:52 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by sungoal » Tue Sep 27, 2011 7:49 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.

A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides

OA: D
When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the previous clause.
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the previous clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.

In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Hi Mitch,

You mentioned that in case of comma+verb-ing modifier, modifier always modify the subject of the previous clause. Does this rule applies to every case of comma+verb-ing modifier?

I have seen some cases in which comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the noun preceding comma.

And in some cases comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the action of the previous clause too. Could you explain both the above mentioned cases with example?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:14 pm
Good Discussion. Explanation (,+ing) should modify the subject of previous clause is the take away. Thanks Brian.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:50 am
sungoal wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.

A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides

OA: D
When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the previous clause.
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the previous clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.

In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Hi Mitch,

You mentioned that in case of comma+verb-ing modifier, modifier always modify the subject of the previous clause. Does this rule applies to every case of comma+verb-ing modifier?

I have seen some cases in which comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the noun preceding comma.

And in some cases comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the action of the previous clause too. Could you explain both the above mentioned cases with example?
A modifying phrase that begins with COMMA + VERBing typically exhibits the following characteristics:

-- the VERBing refers to the subject of the preceding clause.
-- the VERBing expresses an action that is contemporaneous with -- that takes place at the same time as -- the action of the preceding clause.
-- the modifying phrase modifies the entire preceding clause.

I have argued that even a modifying phrase that begins with including displays these characteristics:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/verb-ing-mod ... tml#394719

If you've come across what seems to be an exception, please post it.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:58 am
I have some notes for appositive. Things are discrete.


Lisa has to run many errands.
Lisa's mother suffers from allergies that prevent her from leaving the house.
Combine above two sentences:
Lisa has to run many errands, allergies preventing her mother from leaving the house. (Active participle)
OR
Lisa has to run many errands, her mother prevented from leaving the house by allergies (passive participle)

It only works if the noun in question is an ABSTRACT noun (i.e. not a concrete object, person, etc). such as "activity", "finding", "idea", "notion", "statistic", etc.
John, his arms flailing in the wind, called out desperately for help.
This sort of modifier (COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN) can be used to refer back to the WHOLE IDEA of the preceding clause.
Let's say that scientists discover that X is 60 percent of Y, and that they are shocked by this finding.

Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, which has shocked many in the scientific community.
Above sentence is Incorrect because it implies that Y itself has shocked many in the scientific community. That's not true.

Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked many in the scientific community.
Or
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a statistic that has shocked many in the scientific community.
These are correct because the abstract noun "finding" or "statistic" may refer to the whole idea of the preceding clause.

James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, an outing that was much more enjoyable than working all day.
Here, "an outing" is abstract noun. It describes the whole previous clause (going for dinner and drinks).

On the other hand, COMMA + CONCRETE NOUN is normally used to refer to the preceding noun (much like "which").
James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, a consultant from the west end.
Here, "a consultant" is a concrete noun. It only describes "Mr. Easton ", not the whole idea of the preceding clause.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:19 am
Responding to a PM.

@sungoal, if you have further doubts about usage of verb-ing modifiers, you may access the concept Modifiers - Verb-ing in the free trial of e-GMAT SC course. Just register at the website and access the concept.

I will be happy to address any questions that you may have.

Regards,

Payal
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1