In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides
OA: D
Use of verb-ing modifier
This topic has expert replies
- Bryant@VeritasPrep
- MBA Admissions Consultant
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 4:06 am
- Thanked: 175 times
- Followed by:68 members
- GMAT Score:750
D. is optimal. verbs in the underlined portion must be parallel.
Bryant Michaels
MBA Admissions Consultant
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
MBA Admissions Consultant
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the preceding clause.sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides
OA: D
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the preceding clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.
In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- e-GMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: US
- Thanked: 527 times
- Followed by:227 members
Got a PM regarding this question. I would add the following to the expert explanation provided above:
Note the construction of the modifier in choices D and E. It is Noun + Noun Modifier and it can actually provide additional information about any specific part of the preceding clause - a zoom lens effect. You can read more about these modifiers at the link below:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=584
Note the construction of the modifier in choices D and E. It is Noun + Noun Modifier and it can actually provide additional information about any specific part of the preceding clause - a zoom lens effect. You can read more about these modifiers at the link below:
https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=584
Register for free live sessions
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the previous clause.sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides
OA: D
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the previous clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.
In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
You mentioned that in case of comma+verb-ing modifier, modifier always modify the subject of the previous clause. Does this rule applies to every case of comma+verb-ing modifier?
I have seen some cases in which comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the noun preceding comma.
And in some cases comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the action of the previous clause too. Could you explain both the above mentioned cases with example?
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:6 members
Good Discussion. Explanation (,+ing) should modify the subject of previous clause is the take away. Thanks Brian.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
A modifying phrase that begins with COMMA + VERBing typically exhibits the following characteristics:sungoal wrote:Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:When you see COMMA + VERBing, the present participle modifier (VERBing) should refer to the SUBJECT of the previous clause.sungoal wrote:In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype
of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal
conditions for the mollusks' growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides
OA: D
Thus, in A and B, sitting incorrectly refers to a firm (the subject of the previous clause).
It is not a firm in Scotland but a FARM that sits below the surface of the ocean.
Eliminate A and B.
In C, sits is not parallel with providing. Eliminate C.
In E, is sitting is not parallel with it provides. Eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
You mentioned that in case of comma+verb-ing modifier, modifier always modify the subject of the previous clause. Does this rule applies to every case of comma+verb-ing modifier?
I have seen some cases in which comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the noun preceding comma.
And in some cases comma+verb-ing modifier modifies the action of the previous clause too. Could you explain both the above mentioned cases with example?
-- the VERBing refers to the subject of the preceding clause.
-- the VERBing expresses an action that is contemporaneous with -- that takes place at the same time as -- the action of the preceding clause.
-- the modifying phrase modifies the entire preceding clause.
I have argued that even a modifying phrase that begins with including displays these characteristics:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/verb-ing-mod ... tml#394719
If you've come across what seems to be an exception, please post it.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
- Thanked: 50 times
- Followed by:4 members
I have some notes for appositive. Things are discrete.
Lisa has to run many errands.
Lisa's mother suffers from allergies that prevent her from leaving the house.
Combine above two sentences:
Lisa has to run many errands, allergies preventing her mother from leaving the house. (Active participle)
OR
Lisa has to run many errands, her mother prevented from leaving the house by allergies (passive participle)
It only works if the noun in question is an ABSTRACT noun (i.e. not a concrete object, person, etc). such as "activity", "finding", "idea", "notion", "statistic", etc.
John, his arms flailing in the wind, called out desperately for help.
This sort of modifier (COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN) can be used to refer back to the WHOLE IDEA of the preceding clause.
Let's say that scientists discover that X is 60 percent of Y, and that they are shocked by this finding.
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, which has shocked many in the scientific community.
Above sentence is Incorrect because it implies that Y itself has shocked many in the scientific community. That's not true.
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked many in the scientific community.
Or
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a statistic that has shocked many in the scientific community.
These are correct because the abstract noun "finding" or "statistic" may refer to the whole idea of the preceding clause.
James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, an outing that was much more enjoyable than working all day.
Here, "an outing" is abstract noun. It describes the whole previous clause (going for dinner and drinks).
On the other hand, COMMA + CONCRETE NOUN is normally used to refer to the preceding noun (much like "which").
James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, a consultant from the west end.
Here, "a consultant" is a concrete noun. It only describes "Mr. Easton ", not the whole idea of the preceding clause.
Lisa has to run many errands.
Lisa's mother suffers from allergies that prevent her from leaving the house.
Combine above two sentences:
Lisa has to run many errands, allergies preventing her mother from leaving the house. (Active participle)
OR
Lisa has to run many errands, her mother prevented from leaving the house by allergies (passive participle)
It only works if the noun in question is an ABSTRACT noun (i.e. not a concrete object, person, etc). such as "activity", "finding", "idea", "notion", "statistic", etc.
John, his arms flailing in the wind, called out desperately for help.
This sort of modifier (COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN) can be used to refer back to the WHOLE IDEA of the preceding clause.
Let's say that scientists discover that X is 60 percent of Y, and that they are shocked by this finding.
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, which has shocked many in the scientific community.
Above sentence is Incorrect because it implies that Y itself has shocked many in the scientific community. That's not true.
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked many in the scientific community.
Or
Recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a statistic that has shocked many in the scientific community.
These are correct because the abstract noun "finding" or "statistic" may refer to the whole idea of the preceding clause.
James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, an outing that was much more enjoyable than working all day.
Here, "an outing" is abstract noun. It describes the whole previous clause (going for dinner and drinks).
On the other hand, COMMA + CONCRETE NOUN is normally used to refer to the preceding noun (much like "which").
James went for dinner and drinks with Mr. Easton, a consultant from the west end.
Here, "a consultant" is a concrete noun. It only describes "Mr. Easton ", not the whole idea of the preceding clause.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- e-GMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: US
- Thanked: 527 times
- Followed by:227 members
Responding to a PM.
@sungoal, if you have further doubts about usage of verb-ing modifiers, you may access the concept Modifiers - Verb-ing in the free trial of e-GMAT SC course. Just register at the website and access the concept.
I will be happy to address any questions that you may have.
Regards,
Payal
@sungoal, if you have further doubts about usage of verb-ing modifiers, you may access the concept Modifiers - Verb-ing in the free trial of e-GMAT SC course. Just register at the website and access the concept.
I will be happy to address any questions that you may have.
Regards,
Payal
Register for free live sessions
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories