BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is y - x > 1/x - y ?

Expert replies
by vinni.k » Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:45 am
Is y - x > 1/x - y ?

(1). |x - y| > 1
(2). y > x

Answer is B

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Last edited by vinni.k on Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jan 23, 2012 5:06 am
vinni.k wrote:Is y-x > 1/(x-y)?

(1). |x - y| > 1
(2). y > x

Answer is B

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
I've amended the problem, which had been posted incorrectly.
Question stem, corrected: Is y-x > 1/(x-y)?
Statement 1, corrected: |x-y| > 1.

Statement 1: |x-y| > 1.
If x-y = 2, then y-x = -2.
Plugging these values into the question stem:
-2 > 1/2?
NO.

If x-y = -2, then y-x = 2.
Plugging these values into the question stem:
2 > 1/-2?
YES.
Since in the first case the answer is NO and in the second case the answer is YES, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: y>x.
Thus, y-x > 0 and x-y < 0.
Plugging these relationships into the question stem:
positive > 1/(negative)?
Since the answer will always be YES, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by MBACenter » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:36 am
vinni.k wrote:Is y - x > 1/(x - y) ?

(1). |x - y| > 1
(2). y > x

Answer is B

Thanks & Regards
Vinni
Another approach to this problem is to invent our own little third unknown called "z." If we say that z = y - x, then -z = x - y. So then the question becomes, "Is z > 1/-z?"

*THAT* question is much, much easier to answer. The answer will be YES if z is positive and NO if z is negative.

So the question becomes, "Is z positive?" and therefore, "Is y - x positive?" or, in other words, "Is y - x > 0?"

Or, more ominously, "Is y > x?"

STATEMENT 1 needs to be reduced. How to reduce it depends on whether x is greater than y.

If x is greater than or equal to y, the statement becomes x - y > 1 or x > y + 1. This would clearly make the answer to our question NO.

If y is greater than x, the statement becomes y - x > 1 or y > x + 1. This would clearly make the answer to our question YES.

So statement 1 is not sufficient to give a definitive yes or a definitive no.

STATEMENT 2, on the other hand, gives us nothing less than the reductive condition of the goal statement we wanted to verify. So, it is sufficient to say definitely YES.
Academic Coordinator
MBA Center Paris
Join the discussion

by vinni.k » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:49 am
Mitch, thanks for correcting my mistake. I was solving this question incorrectly because of this reason. I should not have missed the signs of absolute values.
I have also edited the first post so that others don't get confuse if they want to solve this question.
GMATGuruNY wrote:
I've amended the problem, which had been posted incorrectly.
Question stem, corrected: Is y-x > 1(x-y)?
Statement 1, corrected: |x-y| > 1.

Statement 1: |x-y| > 1.
If x-y = 2, then y-x = -2.
Plugging these values into the question stem:
-2 > 1/2?
NO.

If x-y = -2, then y-x = 2.
Plugging these values into the question stem:
2 > 1/-2?
YES.
Since in the first case the answer is NO and in the second case the answer is YES, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: y>x.
Thus, y-x > 0 and x-y < 0.
Plugging these relationships into the question stem:
positive > 1/(negative)?
Since the answer will always be YES, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Join the discussion