BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is y>0?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatmachoman » Sun May 09, 2010 4:58 am
neoreaves wrote:If x and y are integers and x>0, is y>0?
1. 7x-2y>0
2. -y<x
st 1 :

7x-2y>0

7x >2y
y can be -ve or ve or 0

Insufficient

2.-y<x

x>-y. I am not able to "derive" any relation.
So i tried plugging in values.

Case 1: x = 7 y = 2
so , 7 >-2 (YES)

case 2: X =7 y= -2

so, 7> -(-2)
7>2( YES).

here X can take either a +ve or -ve value. Inconsistent

Pick E!

@Nero bhai...Ur DS is tricky & tuf sometimes... Kindly request you to post OA to clear the backlog!
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun May 09, 2010 7:07 am
If x and y are integers and x>0, is y>0?
1. 7x-2y>0
2. -y<x

from (1) 7x-2y>0

We only know x > 0 .

Y can be positive OR negative and still satisfy equation 1 .

Insufficient .

2. -y<x -------> x > - y

As proven by "gmatmachoman"

"y" can be positive OR negative "x" being positive . Pick numbers .


Combine (1) and (2)

7x - 2y > 0

x>- y ---------> x + y > 0

Multiply both sides by 7 -------> 7x + 7y > 0

Subtract 1 and 2

7x - 2y > 0
-7x - 7y > 0
-----------------
0 - 9y > 0


- 9y > 0 this is only possible when y < 0 .

Hence I would go for C .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun May 09, 2010 7:12 am
Rockey Bhai..wonderful..U opened my eyes...ahhaha!! Seems I forgot the whole thing of option C!!

Wonderful reply!!Thx a lot..actually making mistakes is "also" a nice way of learning.. Provided i do only in my "practicezone BTW"
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun May 09, 2010 7:27 am
Govi Bhai ,

Seems like its not my day to make mistakes :) . Good question BTW !!!
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun May 09, 2010 7:35 am
hmm very much true...keep posting bro
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Sun May 09, 2010 8:47 am
rockey...i must say that was superb :) ...lets hope we all Beat the GMAT to the ground
Join the discussion

by Ashish8 » Sun May 09, 2010 9:01 am
rockeyb wrote: Multiply both sides by 7 -------> 7x + 7y > 0

Subtract 1 and 2

7x - 2y > 0
-7x - 7y > 0
-----------------
0 - 9y > 0


- 9y > 0 this is only possible when y < 0 .
Rocky, is this a valid operation? I don't think you can subtract inequlities like that cause at the same time you're multiplying the whole inequlity by -1. Which would make the equation:

-7x -7y < 0

This flips the sign and then a simple addition of the two equations is not possible.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Sun May 09, 2010 9:47 am
Ashish8 wrote:
rockeyb wrote: Multiply both sides by 7 -------> 7x + 7y > 0

Subtract 1 and 2

7x - 2y > 0
-7x - 7y > 0
-----------------
0 - 9y > 0


- 9y > 0 this is only possible when y < 0 .
Rocky, is this a valid operation? I don't think you can subtract inequlities like that cause at the same time you're multiplying the whole inequlity by -1. Which would make the equation:

-7x -7y < 0

This flips the sign and then a simple addition of the two equations is not possible.
Bro ,

I know we can add or subtract inequalities and equations consisting inequalities . Even we can solve simultaneous equations using inequalities .

The only operation which you need to look out for are multiplication and division by negative number as that will flip the inequality sign .

But I can see your point here . But the thing is we are not trying to multiply both sides of the equation , instead we are subtracting one equation from another .

If we multiply both sides by -1 then the sign would flip . In case of adding or subtracting inequalities we just need to line up the inequalities and perform addition and subtraction as we would do with equality sign.
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sun May 09, 2010 10:30 am
rockeyb wrote:
Ashish8 wrote:
rockeyb wrote: Multiply both sides by 7 -------> 7x + 7y > 0

Subtract 1 and 2

7x - 2y > 0
-7x - 7y > 0
-----------------
0 - 9y > 0


- 9y > 0 this is only possible when y < 0 .
Rocky, is this a valid operation? I don't think you can subtract inequlities like that cause at the same time you're multiplying the whole inequlity by -1. Which would make the equation:

-7x -7y < 0

This flips the sign and then a simple addition of the two equations is not possible.
Bro ,

I know we can add or subtract inequalities and equations consisting inequalities . Even we can solve simultaneous equations using inequalities .

The only operation which you need to look out for are multiplication and division by negative number as that will flip the inequality sign .

But I can see your point here . But the thing is we are not trying to multiply both sides of the equation , instead we are subtracting one equation from another .

If we multiply both sides by -1 then the sign would flip . In case of adding or subtracting inequalities we just need to line up the inequalities and perform addition and subtraction as we would do with equality sign.
rocky,

we should not subtract the inequalities. Addition is okay if the inequalities have the same sign.


see this :

1) 3 > 0
2) 7 > 0

will (1) - (2) be greater than 0? no.

we can tell that (2) - (1) > 0 BECAUSE we know that 7>3.

But in the inequality, like one above, we are not sure which one is greater because of the variables. Hence, subtraction should not be done.

HTH.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun May 09, 2010 10:31 am
neoreaves wrote:rockey...i must say that was superb :) ...lets hope we all Beat the GMAT to the ground
Ya bro..certainly it was nice feeling well rockey banged/demystified that one for us! Pranab bhai u rock !!
Join the discussion

by nakul_anand » Sun May 09, 2010 10:48 am
Hello,

I am confused between C and E

Let x=4 and y=3

7x-2y = 28-6=22>0
and
-y<x (-3<4)


Let x=4 and y=-3
7x-2y = 28+6 = 34>0
and
-y<x (3<4)

So y can be either positive or negative. Right?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sun May 09, 2010 10:53 am
nakul_anand wrote:Hello,

I am confused between C and E

Let x=4 and y=3

7x-2y = 28-6=22>0
and
-y<x (-3<4)


Let x=4 and y=-3
7x-2y = 28+6 = 34>0
and
-y<x (3<4)

So y can be either positive or negative. Right?
harsha,
wat u said makes sense very much....!!

so in that case we cant do subtraction of equalities...
Join the discussion

by Ashish8 » Sun May 09, 2010 12:14 pm
With the inequality confusion out of the way. I think the answer should be E.

I did it by picking numbers

x = 2

1. 14 - 2y > 0

y < 7

2. -y < 2

y > -2

Combined together y can be from -1 to 6, when x = 2
Join the discussion

by neoreaves » Sun May 09, 2010 7:20 pm
hmmm ...ok now on second thought....we can not subtract inequalities as suggested by harsha ...though good thing we are discussing this right now to keep our concepts in check
Join the discussion