BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is xy > (x^2)(y^2)?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:28 pm
When DS questions involve algebra in the question stem, always try to simplify the algebra before looking at the statements.

With xy > (x^2)(y^2), it's tempting to want to divide both sides by xy. But what if one of the variables is 0? Or if xy is negative, we'd have to flip the sign. Instead, think conceptually: When would a product of two numbers be greater than the product of the squares? xy would have to be non-negative, since the squares will always be non-negative. It would also have to be between 0 and 1, because only numbers in that range get smaller when they are squared.

Target question: is xy between 0 and 1?

(1) 4x^2 = 19
This tells us that x^2 = 4.75, so x is the positive or negative square root of 4.75 (something close to 2 or -2). This doesn't tell us about y, so it's insufficient.

(2) y^2 = 1
This tells us that y = 1 or -1, but tells us nothing about x. Insufficient.

1 & 2 together
It seems like we don't have enough information, because we don't know whether x and y are positive or negative. But - it doesn't matter. The product xy will equal (approximately) 2 or -2. Either way, (xy)^2 will be larger than xy. Sufficient.

The answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:34 pm
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:13 pm
NandishSS wrote:Is xy > (x^2)(y^2)?
(1) 4x^2 = 19
(2) y^2 = 1

OA:C

Source:Math Revolution
We have a situation: Is xy > (xy)^2?

Whether one/both of x and y is/are positive/negative, RHS [(xy)^2] is positive. So we must focus our energy on whether xy is positive and is greater than (xy)^2 or not.

S1:
4x^2 = 19 => x =(19/4)^(1/2) => x can be positive/negative
We do not have any information about y. S1 itself is insufficient.

S2:
y^2 = 1 => y = +/-1.
We do not have any iformation about x. S2 itself is insufficient.

S1 and S2:
By plugging in the value of x and y, we get,

[+/-(19/4)^(1/2)]*[+/-1] > [19/4]*[1]?

If we take the product of x and y positive, then

|(19/4)^(1/2)| > 19/4?, the answer is NO. The square root of a number greater than 1 (19/4 > 1) is less than the number.

If we take the product of x and y negative, then

-|(19/4)^(1/2)| > 19/4?, the answer is NO. LHS is negative and RHS is positive.

Sufficient.

Answer: C

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Hyderabad | Mexico City | Toronto | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion