BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is | x - y| > | x - z | ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:19 am
the question is simply asking if the distance between x and y is larger than the distance between x and z.

statement 1:

y is further away from 0 than z is. we have no info on the position of x with relative to y and z. insufficient.

statement 2:

x < 0. no info on y and z. insufficient.

both statements together:

still insufficient since we do not know the relative position of x with respect to y and z. insufficient.

for eg.
if x = -1, y = -5, z = 2, then the answer to the question is YES.
if x = -4, y = -5, z = 2, then the answer to the question is NO.

choose E.

-BM-
Join the discussion

Re: Is | x - y| > | x - z | ?

by shilpi84 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:57 am
apoorva.srivastva wrote:Is | x - y| > | x - z | ?

(1) | y | > | z |

(2) x < 0
1 is insufficient as we do not know the signs of y and z.
2 alone is insuffiecient as we do not have any information about y and z.
Taking 1 and 2 together we know that:
|x-y| = |-(k+y)| k+y (substituting -k for x) and |x-z| = |-(k+z)|= k+z
We still do not know the actual values of y and z in order to find which is greater.
Hence answer is C
Join the discussion

by nitya34 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:05 am
plugging values..I am getting A
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:08 am
OA is E
Join the discussion

by hk » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:09 am
I feel the best way to tackle such absolute value problems is using the number line and distance method.. It saves a lot of time.

Is | x - y| > | x - z | ?

You can rephrase the questions as is the distance between x and y greater than the distance between x and z

Statement 1: | y | > | z |

Here the value of x and hence its distance from y or z cannot be determined using this statement.

Statement 2: x<0

This statement just tells us that the value of x is negative and we cannot interpret the distance of y or z from x

Taking them together,

Consider this, if y and z are negative then the distance between x and z could be greater than the distance between x and y if x is closer to z or between z and 0.
Whereas distance between x and y could be greater than the distance between x and z if x is closer to y!!!

[Refer to the picture below to help you visualize this concept]

So since we have contradicting results we can conclude that neither of the statement are helpful. Hence the answer is E.
Attachments
X, Y, Z.JPG
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion