DS Question----Please explain OA is D

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:50 am

DS Question----Please explain OA is D

by Ajitpal Sian » Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:34 pm
Is 2 < x < 4?
1) x² - 5x + 6 < 0
2) 5x² - 25x > 0

A) Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.

B) Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.

C) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.

D) Either statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.

E) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:07 pm
Ajitpal Sian wrote:Is 2 < x < 4?
1) x² - 5x + 6 < 0
2) 5x² - 25x > 0
(1) x² - 5x + 6 < 0 implies (x - 2)(x - 3) < 0, which means that one of the two terms is positive and the other is negative.
If x - 2 > 0, x - 3 < 0 then x > 2 and x < 3 or 2 < x < 3, which implies if x lies between 2 and 3 then x will always lie between 2 and 4; SUFFICIENT.
If x - 2 < 0, x - 3 > 0 then x < 2 and x > 3, which cannot hold true as there is no number which is less than 2 and greater than 3 at the same time.

(2) 5x² - 25x > 0 implies 5x(x - 5) > 0, which means that either both the terms are positive or both the terms are negative.

Following can be the 2 possibilities:
x > 0; x > 5 implies x > 5
x < 0; x < 5 implies x < 0
Combining we get, x < 0, x > 5, so x can not lie between 2 and 4; Sufficient.

But this is a contradiction, as statement 1 gives the answer to the main question (Is 2 < x < 4?) as "yes" but statement 2 gives the answer as "no", which can not be the case in a good GMAT problem.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 am
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thanked: 318 times
Followed by:52 members

by neelgandham » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:18 am
First up, Please don't reveal the OA. You can use the spoiler tab to conceal the answer(How to use it ? - Look here https://www.beatthegmat.com/new-spoilers-t5302.html)

Is 2 < x < 4?

1) x² - 5x + 6 < 0
x² - 5x + 6 < 0, Implies (x-2)*(x-3) < 0. From the in-equation one can clearly tell that the sign of the expression changes ((- to +) or (+ to -)) at 2 and 3. So, let us check the sign of the expression using these limits

a) x<2
(x-2)*(x-3)>0

b) 2<x<3
(x-2)*(x-3)<0


c)x>3
(x-2)*(x-3)>0

So, we know that for all x, where 2<x<3, the expression (x-2)*(x-3)<0. This is sufficient to answer the question 'YES'


2) 5x² - 25x > 0

5x² - 25x > 0, implies 5x*(x-5)>0. From the in-equation one can clearly tell that the sign of the expression changes ((- to +) or (+ to -)) at 0 and 5. So, let us check the sign of the expression using these limits

a) x<0
5x*(x-5)>0


b) 0<x<5
5x*(x-5)<0

c)x>5
5x*(x-5)>0


So, we know that for all x, where x>5 and x<0, the expression 5x*(x-5)>0. So, x doesn't lie between 2,3.This is sufficient to answer the question 'NO'


As Anurag quoted
This is a contradiction, as statement 1 gives the answer to the main question (Is 2 < x < 4?) as "yes" but statement 2 gives the answer as "no", which can not be the case in a good GMAT problem.
Do you mind posting the source of the question please ?
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/