BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is x > y?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sat May 08, 2010 9:44 am
imo A

1,is sufficient alone but 2is not sufficient
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat May 08, 2010 9:46 am
neoreaves wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y
St 1 :

x= 0.75 Y

X can greater or lesser than Y depending on Y. If Y is positive x is less than Y. If Y is negative then X can greater than Y.

Inconsistent- Insufficient.

St 2:

|y - x| = x - y

y-x =x-y

: 2y =2x

y=x
from this we can answer whether x>y as we have deduced x=y. The answer may be a YES or a NO. But it is definite.

Going further for nailing it, try some plugging in values for X & Y with X>Y & X<Y

Case 1: X >Y
Let X =2 Y= 1

|1-2| =2-1

|-1| = 1
1=1
YES X > Y

Case 2: X= 1 Y=2
|2-1| = 1-2

|1| = -1
LHS NOT equal to RHS . So X is not less than Y.

St 2 is sufficient to say X >Y

Pick B

Plz correct me if my method is wrong.
Join the discussion

by iamseer » Sat May 08, 2010 10:58 am
neoreaves wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y
xy≠ 0. So, x≠ 0, y≠ 0

from 1:
x=3y/4
If y is negative, x>y
If y is positive, x<y
Insufficient.

from 2:
|y - x| = x - y
if y>x, y-x=x-y, y=x, but y>x. So, this can't be.
if x>y, y-x=-(x-y)=y-x So, this is possible.
if x=y, y-x=x-y, So, again this is possible.
Insufficient

Combining 1 and 2:
For x and y to satisfy both 1 and 2, x≠y, and x>y

IMO answer C
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat May 08, 2010 11:07 am
Seer bhai,

can u explain using some plugged values?
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sat May 08, 2010 11:24 am
one question to all :

if I say, |Z| = ?

it will be Z if Z is positive.

and it will be -Z if Z is negative.


now, just put y-x in place of Z and look at statement 2 again.

does anyone want to change his answer? ;)
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat May 08, 2010 11:26 am
harshavardhanc wrote:one question to all :

if I say, |Z| = ?

it will be Z if Z is positive.

and it will be -Z if Z is negative.


now, just put y-x in place of Z and look at statement 2 again.

does anyone want to change his answer? ;)
harsha bhai...

plz plz no surprise..i want toc ur answer, ahahhaha!!
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sat May 08, 2010 11:49 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
harshavardhanc wrote:one question to all :

if I say, |Z| = ?

it will be Z if Z is positive.

and it will be -Z if Z is negative.


now, just put y-x in place of Z and look at statement 2 again.

does anyone want to change his answer? ;)
harsha bhai...

plz plz no surprise..i want toc ur answer, ahahhaha!!
macho Anna,

all I'm saying is if you put y-x in place of Z and look at st2 again, you'll find that

y-x should be -ve to satisfy it.

implies, y-x < 0 OR y<x. Sufficient to answer the question. ;) hence, B :D
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat May 08, 2010 11:55 am
harshavardhanc wrote:
gmatmachoman wrote:
harshavardhanc wrote:one question to all :

if I say, |Z| = ?

it will be Z if Z is positive.

and it will be -Z if Z is negative.


now, just put y-x in place of Z and look at statement 2 again.

does anyone want to change his answer? ;)
harsha bhai...

plz plz no surprise..i want toc ur answer, ahahhaha!!
macho Anna,

all I'm saying is if you put y-x in place of Z and look at st2 again, you'll find that

y-x should be -ve to satisfy it.

implies, y-x < 0 OR y<x. Sufficient to answer the question. ;) hence, B :D
Harsha..that was awesome...!! B wins!!
Join the discussion

by iamseer » Sat May 08, 2010 12:46 pm
@Harsha,
you are right. But aren't we ignoring the possibility that x can be equal to y also.

If x=y, statement 2 still holds true.

@gmatmachoman

here are the numbers to plug in

statement 2:
x,y,y-x,|y-x|,x-y
-3,-2,1,1,-1 -fails
-3,-4,-1,1,1 - passes x>y
-3,2,5,5,-5 - fails
-3,-3,0,0,0 - passes x=y
3,4,1,1,-1 - fails
3,2,-1,1,1 - passes x>y
3,-4,-7,-7,7 - passes x>y

So, x is either greater or equal to y to satisfy the condition given in statement 2[/list]
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Sat May 08, 2010 1:11 pm
iamseer wrote:@Harsha,
you are right. But aren't we ignoring the possibility that x can be equal to y also.

If x=y, statement 2 still holds true.

@gmatmachoman

here are the numbers to plug in

statement 2:
x,y,y-x,|y-x|,x-y
-3,-2,1,1,-1 -fails
-3,-4,-1,1,1 - passes x>y
-3,2,5,5,-5 - fails
-3,-3,0,0,0 - passes x=y
3,4,1,1,-1 - fails
3,2,-1,1,1 - passes x>y
3,-4,-7,-7,7 - passes x>y

So, x is either greater or equal to y to satisfy the condition given in statement 2[/list]
agree! thanks mate! :)
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion