Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Is X>Y DS question

Expert replies
by dzelkas » Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:29 pm
I am confused about this question

Is X>Y?
(i) x/(3y)>1/3
(ii) -x+p<-y+p

the answer is (b) where (ii) alone is sufficient
I understand (ii) where we get x>y
but in (i)

don't we also get x>y?

if it is:

x/(3y)>1/3 if we multiplu both sides by 3Y
don't we get the answer x>y?
I think I am just making silly algebra mistake

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by agps » Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:17 am
all i can think of is that maybe they assume you can't be sure if Y is diferent from 0?

but i would have anwered D.
Join the discussion

still no go

by dzelkas » Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:19 am
The response they say is that in (1) x and y could be either positive or negative.. still don't get it
anyone can help out on this one?
Join the discussion

by beny » Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:58 am
Be careful when multiplying both sides of an inequality by a variable. If you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number, you must flip the inequality. Likewise, if you multiply both sides of an inequality by a variable that represents a negative number, you must flip the inequality. Thus, if x and y are both negative, and x/3y>1/3, multplying both sides by 3y would yield x<y.

i.e.
x=2 and y=1, x>y
x=-2, and y=-1, x<y
Join the discussion

by dzelkas » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:09 am
thanks! its crazy, I knew the rule to do it in the (ii) but didn't even think about it in the first part..
Join the discussion

my response

by ack » Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:02 am
This is how I would think of this problem

1. x/(3Y)> 1/3

x/(3y) is equivalent to (1/3)*(x/y) so from statement 1 we get
(1/3)*(x/y) > 1/3 . We can divide both sides by 1/3 (no variables in 1/3) and we get (x/y) >1 . We can't cross multiply because we don't know the signs of x and y which implies that both x and y could be positive or both x and y could be negative (they have to have the same sign since x/y > 1). So the statement is insufficient

2. -x+p < -y + p

Here we can take away p from both sides by subracting it from both sides and we are left with -x < -y . Multiplying both sides by -1 we get x>y

ack
Join the discussion