missrochelle wrote:this number line approach seems so tedious... i.e More than 2 minutes! Is it common on the GMAT these days?
it shouldn't be overly tedious -- it's actually the standard protocol for solving inequalities like this. if it seems tedious or long, that's probably because you haven't practiced it enough yet.
same as with any other algebraic process. the first time you solved a quadratic equation, complete with factoring and rearrangement of terms, you might have had the same thought -- but after solving hundreds of them, you would no longer find this to be the case. therefore, if the problem is just that you haven't solved very many of these, you may want to grab a high school algebra book and get cracking.
--
incidentally, it's also the standard way of solving inequalities that contain fractional expressions, too. when you make that number line for a fractional inequality, you need to include two kinds of values as boundary points of the regions:
1) values that are zeros of the corresponding equation (this is the same as what's shown here)
2) values that make the denominators of the fractions equal to zero.
so, for instance, given the equation (x + 2)(x - 3)/(x + 5) < 0, you have to include -2, 3,
and -5 on your number line, not just -2 and 3.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron