Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Is x>10^10

Expert replies
by anayeri » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:16 pm
Is x > 10^10 ?

(1) x > 2^34

(2) x = 2^35

OA: D

EDIT: please note, both statements have been changed to include the exponent sign, as they had not been transfered in the original copy/paste.
Last edited by anayeri on Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:40 pm
IMO B.

Stmt 1. x > 254

X can be any number from 255 to infinity. Depending on the value, x could be < 10^10 OR = 10^10 OR > 10^10. So insufficient.
(any number < 10 ^10 could have been used in stmt 1 (

Stmt 2.
x = 255.

So x definitely < 10^20.
Always false. So sufficient.

Hence B
Join the discussion

by anayeri » Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:54 pm
sorry vittal - I forgot to include the exponents in the question.

Try again.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:09 pm
Stmt II

No need to do anyhting but say SUFF since we have x=2^35 which is one definite value from which we can say if its > 10^10 or not

Stmt I

x>2^34 i.e x> 2^10 * 2^24 (2^2 can be approximated to 5^1)

10^10 = 2^10 * 5^10


x> 2^10 * 5 ^ 12

SUFF

D)
Join the discussion

by anayeri » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:33 pm
The answer also had an "approximation". For some reason, I don't feel comfortable doing that. I guess there really isn't any other way though.

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:38 pm
I guess there really isn't any other way though
IMO Yeah approximation would be the way to go!

3^3 = 5^2

2^2= 5^1
Join the discussion

by Edthesock » Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:20 pm
first thing to do is break 10^10 into something easier to work with:

10^10 = (5x2)^10 = 5^10 x 2^10

Can't really do much more with it than that.

For the 1st equation, x > 2^34 we know that if 2^34 > 10^10, then this answer is sufficient. If not, x can potentially be a number lower than 10>10, but also higher because we know only that it is greater than 2^34, but that could mean any number onward.

so we break 2^34 down to something easier to work with:

2^34 = 2^24 x 2^10 = 4^12 x 2^10

at this stage, all you need to do is figure out whether 4^12 > 5^10

I (correctly) guessed that it was, but if someone has a better way to figure out that it is, I'd love to hear it.

Same procedure for the second one if you care to solve for x, but we have a fixed value, so we really don't need to. you can for fun I guess, but there's no need, you know (2) is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Alara533 » Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:17 am
This is a recently posted question. Please check before you post the same question.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/inequality-3-t30005.html
Join the discussion