BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is this a misprint by GMAC

Data Sufficiency, Multi-Source Reasoning, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis
Expert replies
by vikram4689 » Fri May 11, 2012 5:07 am
https://www.mba.com/the-gmat/nex-gen/sam ... 1?next=yes

Checkout the Q1 in above link. Given answer is 4000-5000yrs. For this to be true sum of ages should be at least 4000*3=12000yrs

Calculating the sum = 900+3000+5300=9200yrs (which is < 12000yrs)

I can't find anything wrong here but i also know that GMAC is never wrong
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Insights |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri May 11, 2012 7:14 am
vikram4689 wrote:https://www.mba.com/the-gmat/nex-gen/sam ... 1?next=yes

Checkout the Q1 in above link. Given answer is 4000-5000yrs. For this to be true sum of ages should be at least 4000*3=12000yrs

Calculating the sum = 900+3000+5300=9200yrs (which is < 12000yrs)

I can't find anything wrong here but i also know that GMAC is never wrong
The question asks us to consider "all integer values of the age from 12 to 30."
In your solution, you are considering the ages 12, 16 and 20 only.

We actually need to find the mass at ages 12, 13, 14, . . . 29, and 30, and then find the average of these masses.

Now, of course the GMAC doesn't want to perform such a tedious calculation. Instead, we need to get a feel for the average.

First notice that from ages 12 to 20, the increases are somewhat constant. In other words, since that curve from points A to C is close to straight, it looks like the T-Rex's mass increases by the approximately the same amount each year. There's a nice rule that deals with the average of a set of values when those values are equally spaced: In a set where the numbers are equally spaced, the mean will equal the median.

So, if we examine only the masses from ages 12 to 20, the average mass will be approximately equal to the median mass. This median mass will occur in the middle, at age 16.

The T-Rex's mass at at 16 is about 3000 kg, so we can conclude that, during the 8 years between ages 12 to 20, the T-Rex's average mass is 3000 kg.

Now notice that, from ages 21 to 30, T-Rex's average mass is about 5500 kg.

At this point, we have a weighted averages question.

Ages 12 to 20: During these 8 years the average mass is about 3000 kg
Ages 21 to 30: During these 10 years the average mass is about 5500 kg

Given this, we can see that the average mass during the entire 18-year period will be closer to 5500 than it is to 3000.

So, the average mass must be greater than 4250 kg (which is halfway between 3000 and 5500).

I cover this concept of weighted averages in the following video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... ics?id=805

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Fri May 11, 2012 7:33 am
vikram4689 wrote:
I can't find anything wrong here but i also know that GMAC is never wrong
My copy of OG12 would disagree ;)
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Fri May 11, 2012 8:14 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
vikram4689 wrote:https://www.mba.com/the-gmat/nex-gen/sam ... 1?next=yes

Checkout the Q1 in above link. Given answer is 4000-5000yrs. For this to be true sum of ages should be at least 4000*3=12000yrs

Calculating the sum = 900+3000+5300=9200yrs (which is < 12000yrs)

I can't find anything wrong here but i also know that GMAC is never wrong
The question asks us to consider "all integer values of the age from 12 to 30."
In your solution, you are considering the ages 12, 16 and 20 only.

We actually need to find the mass at ages 12, 13, 14, . . . 29, and 30, and then find the average of these masses.

Now, of course the GMAC doesn't want to perform such a tedious calculation. Instead, we need to get a feel for the average.

First notice that from ages 12 to 20, the increases are somewhat constant. In other words, since that curve from points A to C is close to straight, it looks like the T-Rex's mass increases by the approximately the same amount each year. There's a nice rule that deals with the average of a set of values when those values are equally spaced: In a set where the numbers are equally spaced, the mean will equal the median.

So, if we examine only the masses from ages 12 to 20, the average mass will be approximately equal to the median mass. This median mass will occur in the middle, at age 16.

The T-Rex's mass at at 16 is about 3000 kg, so we can conclude that, during the 8 years between ages 12 to 20, the T-Rex's average mass is 3000 kg.

Now notice that, from ages 21 to 30, T-Rex's average mass is about 5500 kg.

At this point, we have a weighted averages question.

Ages 12 to 20: During these 8 years the average mass is about 3000 kg
Ages 21 to 30: During these 10 years the average mass is about 5500 kg

Given this, we can see that the average mass during the entire 18-year period will be closer to 5500 than it is to 3000.

So, the average mass must be greater than 4250 kg (which is halfway between 3000 and 5500).

I cover this concept of weighted averages in the following video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... ics?id=805

Cheers,
Brent
Thanks Brent, i find IR ques. convoluted and 2:30 min is less to understand that convoluted language and then answer 2-3 True/False type assertions. Can you suggest some way how i should proceed.

I find Graphs, Charts etc. easy to comprehend but somehow i am not able to answer all parts of a question correctly and that means 0 credit for that question. Most of my error are because of convoluted language of question
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri May 11, 2012 8:20 am
vikram4689 wrote: Thanks Brent, i find IR ques. convoluted and 2:30 min is less to understand that convoluted language and then answer 2-3 True/False type assertions. Can you suggest some way how i should proceed.

I find Graphs, Charts etc. easy to comprehend but somehow i am not able to answer all parts of a question correctly and that means 0 credit for that question. Most of my error are because of convoluted language of question
I concur. The GMAC's exemplar questions are quite tricky, and hard to complete in 2.5 minutes. I have a feeling that the actual IR questions you see on test day will be easier than the ones floating around.

Having said that, if the official questions are as difficult as the ones floating around, then we're all in the same boat :-)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Fri May 11, 2012 8:33 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote: Having said that, if the official questions are as difficult as the ones floating around, then we're all in the same boat :-)
Yes, they are tricky. I have gone through all 50 IR in OG13 and it seems difficult to solve 12Q in 30 min.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by getdonewithgmat » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:51 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
vikram4689 wrote:https://www.mba.com/the-gmat/nex-gen/sam ... 1?next=yes

Checkout the Q1 in above link. Given answer is 4000-5000yrs. For this to be true sum of ages should be at least 4000*3=12000yrs

Calculating the sum = 900+3000+5300=9200yrs (which is < 12000yrs)

I can't find anything wrong here but i also know that GMAC is never wrong
The question asks us to consider "all integer values of the age from 12 to 30."
In your solution, you are considering the ages 12, 16 and 20 only.

We actually need to find the mass at ages 12, 13, 14, . . . 29, and 30, and then find the average of these masses.

Now, of course the GMAC doesn't want to perform such a tedious calculation. Instead, we need to get a feel for the average.

First notice that from ages 12 to 20, the increases are somewhat constant. In other words, since that curve from points A to C is close to straight, it looks like the T-Rex's mass increases by the approximately the same amount each year. There's a nice rule that deals with the average of a set of values when those values are equally spaced: In a set where the numbers are equally spaced, the mean will equal the median.

So, if we examine only the masses from ages 12 to 20, the average mass will be approximately equal to the median mass. This median mass will occur in the middle, at age 16.

The T-Rex's mass at at 16 is about 3000 kg, so we can conclude that, during the 8 years between ages 12 to 20, the T-Rex's average mass is 3000 kg.

Now notice that, from ages 21 to 30, T-Rex's average mass is about 5500 kg.

At this point, we have a weighted averages question.

Ages 12 to 20: During these 8 years the average mass is about 3000 kg
Ages 21 to 30: During these 10 years the average mass is about 5500 kg

Given this, we can see that the average mass during the entire 18-year period will be closer to 5500 than it is to 3000.

So, the average mass must be greater than 4250 kg (which is halfway between 3000 and 5500).

I cover this concept of weighted averages in the following video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... ics?id=805

Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent, i took the total number of years as 19, 12 to 20 (including 12 and 20) - 9 years and 21 to 30 (incl 21 and 30) - 10 years. Please can you confirm that this is correct or is it 18 years and if i have confused the way we count the number of years?

Thanks!
Join the discussion