BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is the median greater than the mean? (GMAT PREP 1)

Expert replies
by alex.gellatly » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:04 pm
x,3,1,12,8

If x is an integer, is the median of the 5 numbers shown greater than the average (arithmetic mean) of the 5 numbers?

1. x>6
2. x is greater then the median of the 5 numbers.

Thanks
A useful website I found that has every quant OG video explanation:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/useful-websi ... tml#475231
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:24 am
alex.gellatly wrote:x,3,1,12,8

If x is an integer, is the median of the 5 numbers shown greater than the average (arithmetic mean) of the 5 numbers?

1. x>6
2. x is greater then the median of the 5 numbers.

Thanks
Mean of 5 numbers = (x + 1 + 3 + 8 + 12)/5 = (x + 24)/5
Question is: Is Median > (x + 24)/5?

(1) x > 6
If x = 7, then the set of numbers is 1, 3, 7, 8, 12. Here mean = (7 + 24)/5 = 6.2 and median = 7. So, here median (= 7) > mean (= 6.2)
If x = 26, then the set of numbers is 1, 3, 8, 12, 26. Here mean = (26 + 24)/5 = 10 and median = 8. So, here median (= 8) < mean (= 10)
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

(2) x is greater then the median of the 5 numbers implies median = 8
If x = 11, then mean = (11 + 24)/5 = 7. Here median (= 8) > mean (= 7).
If x = 26, then mean = (26 + 24)/5 = 10. Here median (= 8) > mean (= 10).
No definite answer; NOT sufficient.

Combining (1) and (2), we can take the same examples as in statement 2; NOT sufficient.

The correct answer is E.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Nina1987 » Wed Dec 23, 2015 8:11 am
Compared to the median the mean has greater flexibility in terms of how big it can get. So for the median to be greater than the mean we need to limit the upward movement of the mean by restricting the value of x. Thus we need a constraint such as x<(certain number) and since neither of the choices does so answer is E.

For instance, even if we were given x>0
then say x=1 {1 1 3 8 12} 3>25/5? NO
now say x=8 {1 3 7 8 12} 8>(24+8)/5? Yes

on the other hand, say if we were given x<6, the answer would be a definitive No

Does that make sense?
What do others/experts think?
Last edited by Nina1987 on Wed Dec 30, 2015 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:02 pm
Nina1987 wrote:Mean has a greater flexibility in terms of how big it can get. So for the median to be greater than the mean we need to limit the upward movement of the mean by restricting the value of x. Thus we need a constraint such as x<(certain number) and since neither of the choices does so answer is E.

For instance, even if we were given x>0
then say x=1 {1 1 3 8 12} 3>25/5? NO
now say x=8 {1 3 7 8 12} 8>(24+8)/5? Yes

on the other hand, say if we were given x<6, the answer would be a definitive No

Does that make sense?
What do others/experts think?
I think you've got the right idea, but there might be easier way of putting this.

We know the mean is (24 + x)/5, or 4.8 + (x/5).

We know the median is either 3, x, or 8.

So our question becomes

"Is {3, x, or 8} > 4.8 + x/5?"

If x is the median, the question becomes

"Is x > 4.8 + x/5?"

or

"Is x > 6?"

But if 8 is the median, the question becomes

"Is 8 > 4.8 + x/5?"

or

"Is 16 > x?"

S1 tells us that either x or 8 is the median, but this only gets us partly there; NOT SUFFICIENT.

S2 tells us that 8 is the median, so we're closer: now our question is "Is 16 > x?"; NOT SUFFICIENT.

Together, we still want to know if 16 > x, and we still can't say; NOT SUFFICIENT.
Join the discussion