BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is n an integer?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vivekjaiswal » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:47 pm
IMO the answer should be (E)

By statement 1, sqrrt(n)>1 n could be any number be it integer or a fraction (decimal).
By statement 2, sqrrt(n)<2, again n could be an integer or a fraction (decimal)

Taking both statements together 1<sqrrt(n)<2, this again doesn't tell for sure whether n is an integer.

Thus E.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:23 pm
IMO C

1) NOT sufficient
2) NOT SUFF

combined
1<sqrt(n)<2
so the square root is not an integer. the number is not an integer.
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by vivekjaiswal » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:29 pm
tohellandback wrote:IMO C

1) NOT sufficient
2) NOT SUFF

combined
1<sqrt(n)<2
so the square root is not an integer. the number is not an integer.
tohellandback,

I think it wouldn't be advisable to assume that since the sqrrt of a number is not integer, the number itself is also not an integer.

As you would agree that the sqrrt(2) = 1.414, while 2 is an integer. But the sqrrt(2.5) = 1.581 which again lies in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2 but n=2.5 is not an integer, so together also the two statements are not sufficient.

Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

can we have the answers please

by vivekjaiswal » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:34 pm
Hi treker,

Could you please post the OA.


Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:35 pm
vivekjaiswal wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO C

1) NOT sufficient
2) NOT SUFF

combined
1<sqrt(n)<2
so the square root is not an integer. the number is not an integer.
tohellandback,

I think it wouldn't be advisable to assume that since the sqrrt of a number is not integer, the number itself is also not an integer.

As you would agree that the sqrrt(2) = 1.414, while 2 is an integer. But the sqrrt(2.5) = 1.581 which again lies in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2 but n=2.5 is not an integer, so together also the two statements are not sufficient.

Cheers,
Vivek
NO. I don't think so.
integers may have integer or non-integer square root.
for example 2- it is 1.414......(here 1.414 is just a convention. its non terminating and the square of 1.414 is NOT 2)
and for 9- it is 3

so you can be sure that if the square root is not an integer, then the number is not an integer
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by vivekjaiswal » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:50 pm
tohellandback wrote:
vivekjaiswal wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO C

1) NOT sufficient
2) NOT SUFF

combined
1<sqrt(n)<2
so the square root is not an integer. the number is not an integer.
tohellandback,

I think it wouldn't be advisable to assume that since the sqrrt of a number is not integer, the number itself is also not an integer.

As you would agree that the sqrrt(2) = 1.414, while 2 is an integer. But the sqrrt(2.5) = 1.581 which again lies in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2 but n=2.5 is not an integer, so together also the two statements are not sufficient.

Cheers,
Vivek
NO. I don't think so.
integers may have integer or non-integer square root.
for example 2- it is 1.414......(here 1.414 is just a convention. its non terminating and the square of 1.414 is NOT 2)
and for 9- it is 3

so you can be sure that if the square root is not an integer, then the number is not an integer
agreed on your point about sqrrt(2).

But we are not really concerned about the square of a non-integer number, what the question is stating is that the sqrrt of n should lie in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2. Which is true for both n=2 and n=2.5 (irrespective of the fact that whether the sqrrt(n) is a terminating decimal) while 'n' is integer in one of the case and it is not in another.

If the question asks "is 'n' an integer?" and to sufficiently derive that it is not, by following the statements is not possible because of the above mentioned points.

hope that clarifies my point

Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:57 pm
vivekjaiswal wrote:
tohellandback wrote:
vivekjaiswal wrote:
tohellandback wrote:IMO C

1) NOT sufficient
2) NOT SUFF

combined
1<sqrt(n)<2
so the square root is not an integer. the number is not an integer.
tohellandback,

I think it wouldn't be advisable to assume that since the sqrrt of a number is not integer, the number itself is also not an integer.

As you would agree that the sqrrt(2) = 1.414, while 2 is an integer. But the sqrrt(2.5) = 1.581 which again lies in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2 but n=2.5 is not an integer, so together also the two statements are not sufficient.

Cheers,
Vivek
NO. I don't think so.
integers may have integer or non-integer square root.
for example 2- it is 1.414......(here 1.414 is just a convention. its non terminating and the square of 1.414 is NOT 2)
and for 9- it is 3

so you can be sure that if the square root is not an integer, then the number is not an integer
agreed on your point about sqrrt(2).

But we are not really concerned about the square of a non-integer number, what the question is stating is that the sqrrt of n should lie in the range 1<sqrrt(n)<2. Which is true for both n=2 and n=2.5 (irrespective of the fact that whether the sqrrt(n) is a terminating decimal) while 'n' is integer in one of the case and it is not in another.

If the question asks "is 'n' an integer?" and to sufficiently derive that it is not, by following the statements is not possible because of the above mentioned points.

hope that clarifies my point

Cheers,
Vivek
let's tackle it like this
sqrt(1)=1
sqrt(4)=2

now 1<sqrt(n)<2
for n to be an integer, n should be wither 2 or 3
for any value between 1 and 2, the square of that value cannot be 2 or 3.
you can't say 1.414 or 1.732, they are just conventions. the values are non terminating and their squares are not 2 or 3
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by vivekjaiswal » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
tohellandback,

I do agree with your point about 1.414 and 1.732 being conventional numbers used to represent sqrt of 2 and 3.

What I have been trying to emphasise is that the question is not concerned about getting an integer by squaring a non-integer that lies between 1 and 2.
It is just concerned whether we can be sure that n is an integer (or not) if its sqrt lies between 1 and 2.
Keeping that question in my mind; I have an integer 2, sqrt of which (although being a non-terminating decimal) lies between 1 and 2 and another non-integer 2.5 whose sqrt again lies between 1 and 2. Thus we cannot be sure about the property of n given that 1<sqrt(n)<2

I am not sure whether what I say is making any sense or not, but to answer the question by going the other way round, that is trying to find a number between 1 and 2 whose square would yeild an integer, is not the best way to approach this question.

Cheers,
Vivek
Join the discussion

by abhi75 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:39 pm
The answer should be E.

For sqrt(n) to be between 1 and 2, n can have many values such as 2,3, and even 2.5 or 2.7

sqrt(2) = 1.4
sqrt(3) = 1.73
sqrt(2.5) ~ between 1.4 and 1.7
sqrt(2.7) ~ "same as above".

So even with 2 statements we still dont know whether n is an integer or not.

A
Join the discussion

by Dobrov » Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:13 pm
Must be E.
Join the discussion

by life is a test » Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:28 pm
can someone pls let me know if I am evaluating the question too simplistically and hence missing the point of the question (regardless of whether my ans is correct or not).

I chose E for following reasons:
1) sqrt(n) > 1 --> squaring both sides gives n>1 so number can be int or non-int.
2) sqrt(n) < 2 -->squaring both sides gives n<4 so number can be int or non-int

1) and 2) number is more than 1 but less than 4 so can be int or non-int.

many thanks.
Join the discussion