BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Moe invested

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:49 am
Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by neerajkumar1_1 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:14 am
statement 1; n could be 4 and more.. so insufficient...

statement 2: n is definitely greater than 5... so sufficient...

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:20 am
sanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
imo E
Join the discussion

by klmehta03 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:38 am
My answer is E can we have OA pls?
Join the discussion

by klmehta03 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:39 am
My answer is E can we have OA pls?
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:36 pm
sanju09 wrote:Moe invested a total of $5000 at 5 percent simple annual interest for n years. Is n > 4?
(1) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was more than $5500.
(2) At the end of n years; Moe's investment with interest was less than $6500.
i think the answer should be E...
the formular is F=year*interest*the sum of money, so
statement1 n could be any number from 3
statement 2: interest <6500 so the min interest moe could get is 1500 so n should be 6 and 6, n,4..
both is also insufficient
E
Join the discussion

by spartacus1412 » Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:03 am
from statement 1 : n >2
from statement 2 : n <6

none of them prove n >4 alone.

when combined 2<n<6.
hence, E.
Join the discussion