BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is lxl< 1?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by keeyu2 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:02 am
I am not sure if it is C.

Statment 1. x = 3
Statment 2. x <> 3
Join the discussion

IMO E

by Dream Weaver » Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:18 am
A. Gives X=3
B. Gives X Not Equal to 3

Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by ncr_10 » Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:04 am
Statement 1:
i) for x < -1, we get x = 3
ii) for -1 < x < 1 we get x = 1/3
iii) for 1 < x we get x = 3

This means x = 3 or x = 1/3. Not sufficient.

Statement 2: gives x <> 3. Not sufficient.

Both statements together we get x = 1/3. Sufficient.

Hence C.
Join the discussion

by apple100 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:46 pm
ncr_10 wrote:Statement 1:
i) for x < -1, we get x = 3
ii) for -1 < x < 1 we get x = 1/3
iii) for 1 < x we get x = 3

This means x = 3 or x = 1/3. Not sufficient.

Statement 2: gives x <> 3. Not sufficient.

Both statements together we get x = 1/3. Sufficient.

Hence C.
Can you explain further how you solved lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l for x? I am confused w/ the absolute value and inequality signs.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:35 am
Can you explain further how you solved lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l for x? I am confused w/ the absolute value and inequality signs.
Here's my approach:
I'll begin with an aside: if |x| = 5 then x=5 or -5
In general if k = |something| then k = something or k = -(something)
If lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l then either
a) x+1 = 2(x-1) --> x=3
or
b) -(x+1) = 2(x-1) --> x= 1/3

Notice that, since we have two sets of absolutes in the original question, we could have created additional equations: -(x+1) = (2)[-(x-1)] and x+1 = (2)[-(x-1)], but these are simply versions of equations (a) and (b)

I hope that helps.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Sun May 03, 2009 9:35 am
Is lxl< 1?
(1) lx + 1l = 2lx - 1l
(2) lx - 3l &#8800; 0
=================

for 1:

-------|------------------|---------------
-1 1

for x>-1, -(x+1) = -2(x-1)
=> x=3
-1<x<1: x+1 = -2(x-1)
=>3x = 1 or x=1/3
1<x x+1 = 2(x-1) or x=3
so 1 not sufficient as one possiblity is yes another no

2. for x!=3 it could be anything

combine does help as it rule out x=3 possibilities, and so is Ch
Join the discussion