BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Is k > 0?

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

Is k > 0?

by mehravikas » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:45 am
S10-7 If -10 < k <10> 0?

(1) 1/k > 0
(2) k^2 > 0

OA is 'A', but shouldn't the answer be 'D', as we never have something like -0.

Please explain.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:18 am
Thanked: 1 times

by saege » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:15 am
Assuming you Q is this:

If -10<k<10>0?

It says K lies between -10 and 10 then looking at the statements

1. 1/K >0 there is only 1 value of K that makes 1/k >than 0 that is K= 1 and as per the condition k >0.

2. k^2>0

Plug in values

K^2 K Is K>0
4 2 Yes
4 -2 no

So we have a yes and no answer therefore it is not sufficient.

Then ans is A

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:40 pm
Always a good idea to click the "disable html in this post" box below the text box (html uses < and > for tags so if you have html enabled it will mess up inequalities).

You can also go right into "My Profile" and disable it permanently.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:30 am
Thanks for the solution. The original question was - -10 < k < 10, is k > 0?

Mostly in DS questions, we get something like, what is the value of x, given that x^2 > 4.

We cant find a solution to it because we assume, x > +2 or -2. I was thinking on the same terms for the equation k^2 > 0, and saying that k > +0 or -0 would be wrong.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:01 am
Thanked: 2 times

by anshul265 » Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:34 pm
I don't agree with "saege's" explaination for A.

i) When we have 1/k>0 it simply says that 1/k is positive. 1/k can also be a fraction example 1/2 for k=2 and it can be another whole number example 2 for k=0.5. But as we have 1/k positive, we know k is also positive. Sufficient.

ii) This says k^2>0 which means square of k is positive. But k could be both positive or negative. Insufficient.

Thus answer is A.

Follow this positive negative approach to save time as you wouldn't need to consider all possible cases.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sat Jun 14, 2008 3:10 am
anshul's solution above is good- it correctly interprets the first statement, which tells you that k is positive, but no more than that (it does not give you a value for k).
mehravikas wrote: Mostly in DS questions, we get something like, what is the value of x, given that x^2 > 4.

We cant find a solution to it because we assume, x > +2 or -2.
If x^2 > 4, then we know that x > 2 or x < -2.
mehravikas wrote: I was thinking on the same terms for the equation k^2 > 0, and saying that k > +0 or -0 would be wrong.
No, you can look at this in the same way if you like. If k^2 > 0, then k > 0 or k < -0. But -0 is just 0. So if you know k^2 > 0, you know that k > 0 or k < 0 -- in other words, this only tells you that k is not equal to zero. k could have any other value.