BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is AB parallel to CD?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Is AB parallel to CD?

by vittalgmat » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:15 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:Is AB parallel to CD?
(1) Angle a + angle b = 180º
(2) angle a + angle c + angle d + angle e = 360º
Pls post the OA within spoilers.


thanks
Join the discussion

by adamsmith2009 » Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:44 pm
D

Both statements are sufficient
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:58 pm
Sorry for offtopic, testing RSS feed filter
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:18 pm
adamsmith2009 wrote:D

Both statements are sufficient

How is I sufficient ?

IMO its B.
Join the discussion

by zenithexe » Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:45 pm
i agree with madhur, please look at the pic, that's perfectly valid considering the statement 1)
Attachments
Angle.jpg
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:40 am
How B is sufficient to answer the question ?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

Re: Is AB parallel to CD?

by tohellandback » Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:12 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:Is AB parallel to CD?
(1) Angle a + angle b = 180º
(2) angle a + angle c + angle d + angle e = 360º
IMO B
1) the two lines will be parallel when angle a+ angle c=180. (property)
angle c=180-angle b
when b=90, the lines are parallel, but in all other cases lines are not parallel.
NOT SUFF

2)angle a + angle c + angle d + angle e = 360º
angle d+ angle e=180
angle a + angle c=180
SUFF
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:33 am
angle a + angle c = 180. Could you please explain this property which you have used to derive?

However, as I know, these are alternate angles and as per parallel lines property, when a transversal cuts the parallel lines, they form two pair of alternate angles.

How are we assuming these angles are supplementary?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:09 am
viju9162 wrote:angle a + angle c = 180. Could you please explain this property which you have used to derive?

However, as I know, these are alternate angles and as per parallel lines property, when a transversal cuts the parallel lines, they form two pair of alternate angles.

How are we assuming these angles are supplementary?
the property is "interior angles on the same side are supplementary"
plz check the image
Attachments
soln.JPG
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by saakshig » Sun Jun 21, 2015 9:49 pm
Option a)
Angle a + angle b = 180.
Also since we can see that for any situation, angle b + angle c will be 180. (On the same line, supplementary).
This angle a + angle b = angle b + angle c.
Thus angle a = angle c. These are alternate angles. If they are equal lines are parallel.
SUFFICIENT

Option b)
Angles a + c + d + e = 360
d + e = 180 (supplementary)
Thus a + c = 180
Case 1: a=c=90. Lines will be parallel.
Case 2: for any other 2 values of a and c, a will not equal c. Hence not parallel.
INSUFFICIENT.

Answer is A.
Join the discussion