BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is a – b + c greater than a + b – c ?

Expert replies
by Nijeesh » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:39 pm
If a,b, and c are integers, is a - b + c greater than a + b - c ?
(1) b is negative.
(2) c is positive.


stem: is a-b+c > a+b-c
is a+2c>a+2b ?

from 1 & 2.. we can say that a+2c is always greater than a+2b.. (for both a as +ve and -ve) hence Answer is C


is the above approach right ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by harsh.champ » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:41 pm
Nijeesh wrote:If a,b, and c are integers, is a - b + c greater than a + b - c ?
(1) b is negative.
(2) c is positive.


stem: is a-b+c > a+b-c
is a+2c>a+2b ?

from 1 & 2.. we can say that a+2c is always greater than a+2b.. (for both a as +ve and -ve) hence Answer is C


is the above approach right ?
Yes,your approach is perfectly fine.
a-b+c > a+b-c
This implies that a+2c>a+2b

Now, b<0
and c>0
Hence,c>b
So,both statements together are sufficient.C.
Hence,your answer holds.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion

by shashank.ism » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:53 pm
Nijeesh wrote:If a,b, and c are integers, is a - b + c greater than a + b - c ?
(1) b is negative.
(2) c is positive.


stem: is a-b+c > a+b-c
is a+2c>a+2b ?

from 1 & 2.. we can say that a+2c is always greater than a+2b.. (for both a as +ve and -ve) hence Answer is C


is the above approach right ?
to check: a-b+c > a+b-c --> -b+c>b-c
St.1) b is negative , b<0 -->not suff we don't sign of a and c
St.2) c is positive. c>0 --> not suff we don't know sign of a and b

combined ) b<0 and c>0 so -b+c > b-c hence suff.Ans C
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Tue Feb 23, 2010 6:49 am
why aren't you guys simplifying the question all the way?

viz.:
IS a - b + c > a + b - c ?
cancel the a's:
is -b + c > b - c ?
add b to both sides, AND add c to both sides:
is 2c > 2b?
divide by 2:

Is c > b ?

this is the simplified question.

what's ... interesting is that TWO posters did HALF-simplifications (one of you got to "-b+c>b-c" and the other to "a+2c>a+2b", but neither of those posters went all the way to the simplified version)

with this question, it's much easier to see that the answer is (c).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by hamxa » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:29 am
RON: The maker of this question will be mortified if he sees the way u have cut it open (he better not ... :) )
Join the discussion