BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is 2<x<4?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

q: is 2<x<4? ie does x lie between 2 and 4? Y / N

(i) x^2 - 5x + 6 < 0
=> (x-3)(x-2) < 0
=> x < 3 or x < 2
=> lower bound 2 < x does not hold true. So, answer is NO.

(ii) 5x^2 - 25x > 0
=> 5x(x-5) > 0
=> 5x > 0 or x-5 > 0
=> x > 0 or x > 5
=> upper bound x < 4 does not hold true. So, answer is NO.

Hence, [D]
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:06 pm
Stmt I

x^2-5x+6 < 0

(x-2) (x-3) < 0

Case 1: x-2 > 0 and x-3<0
x>2 and x<3

Case 2:
x-2<0 and x-3>0
x<2 and x>3

Not possible

So case 1 is the only case possible which is 2<x<3 therefore 2<x<4

SUFF

Stmt II

5x^2-25x > 0

5x (x-5) >0

Case 1:
5x>0 and x-5>0
x>0 and x>5

This means the more restrictive condition x>5 takes effect

Case 2:

5x<0 and x-5<0
x<0 and x<5

The more restrictive condition x<0 takes effect

x is either negative or if x is positive then x>5

SUFF


My only concern is the 2 statements contradicting each other.


Stuart /Ian/Logitech or others please share your thoughts on if this is ok in a DS problem or may be I am misinterpretting the contardiction piece here.

Regards,
Cramya
Join the discussion

Re: Is 2<x<4?

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:11 pm
hardik.jadeja wrote:Is 2<x<4?
1. (x^2)-5x+6<0
2. 5(x^2)–25x>0

OA is D but I think its is B.
(1) After reverse FOILing:

(x - 3)(x-2) <0

For this to be true, one bracket must be positive and one must be negative.

So, we could have:

x-3 > 0 and x-2 <0
x>3 and x<2

Well hey, that can't happen, so we can ignore it.

Other possibility:

x-3 < 0 and x-2 > 0
x<3 and x>2
2 < x < 3

If x is between 2 and 3, it's definitely between 2 and 4: sufficient.

(2) 5(x^2)–25x>0
x^2 - 5x > 0
x(x-5) > 0

Positive product, so either both terms are positive or both are negative.

Both positive:

x>0 and x-5>0. Therefore, x>5.

Both negative:

x<0 and x-5<0. Therefore, x<0.

Well, if x<0 Or x>5, then x is definitely NOT between 2 and 4. Sufficient.

HOWEVER,

on the actual GMAT, the two statements never contradict. So, while this question is a good test of factoring skill, it's a 100% bogus GMAT question. What's the source? Always posting your source is good!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:17 pm
Thank you Stuart for the clarification. As always an excellent explanation .

Regards,
Cramya
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:43 pm
Thanks for the explanation guys..
@Stuart: Source is Barron's GMAT - CAT 1
Join the discussion