Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Is 1/k > 0?

Expert replies
by wally » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:05 pm
Hi Folks,

k is not equal to 0,1 or -1. Is 1/k >0?

1) 1/(k-1) > 0
2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Apparently the answer is A.

I was wondering if someone would be able to provide some insight as to how this may be.

[spoiler]In my view each statement is sufficient and hence the answer is D.
For statement 1 and 2 to hold true k > 0. Therefore 1/k > 0.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kirvar » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:25 pm
1. 1/(K-1) >0

For this to be true K cannot be less than 1 and for all values that satisfy this condition, 1/K >0

(Sufficient)

2. 1/(K+1) >0

For this to be true K cannot be less than -1 and therefore K can be negative or positive for which 1/K can be greater than or less than zero.

(Not Sufficient)
Join the discussion

by wally » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:53 pm
Thanks for responding.

I'm still a little puzzled by statement 2. I think my thinking is really stuck in a rut.

For this to be true K cannot be less than -1. I agree.

Example if k = -3

1/(k+1) = 1/(-3+1) = 1/(-2) < 0. And so forth for all k < -1.

As far as I can see k can never be < 0 for this equation to hold true. Yet you state "... therefore K can be negative or positive...". If you could illustrate this condition with an example I would really appreciate it.
Join the discussion

Re: Is 1/k > 0?

by vittalgmat » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:29 pm
wally wrote:Hi Folks,

k is not equal to 0,1 or -1. Is 1/k >0?

1) 1/(k-1) > 0
2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Apparently the answer is A.

I was wondering if someone would be able to provide some insight as to how this may be.

[spoiler]In my view each statement is sufficient and hence the answer is D.
For statement 1 and 2 to hold true k > 0. Therefore 1/k > 0.[/spoiler]
IMO it is D.

In both stmts 1 and 2, K has to be +ve > 1 (coz k cannot be = 0, -1, 1).
so 1/k will be >0

Hope I dint miss anything.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:20 am
please try with k = -1/2 in option 2 and you can see.. 1/K can be < 0 and with k = 1/2 . 1/k can be > 0.


Thus only A
Join the discussion

by wally » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:37 am
Thanks. That's great. Just what I needed, a different perspective to shift my thinking.

Indeed if k = -1/2
1/(k+1) = (1/(1/2)) = 2 which > 0
whilst 1/k = 1(-1/2) = -2.

Therefore statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Join the discussion

by anshulseth » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:12 am
Its good to pick nos and solve.
I'll try the normal process to explain.

Q is : is 1/k>0
If K is not equal to 0,1,-1.

For it to be true , first of all K has to >0, and K has to be a fraction.
So all we are looking for is:
Is 0<K<1

Stmt I: if 1/k-1>0
Then K>1 and it will not satisfy our condition of 0<k<1.
So 1/K is not >1
Sufficient

Stmt II:
If 1/K+1>0
We can't comment anything on K, as it can be >1,<1 or negative.
So , insufficient.


This, answer is A
Asset
Join the discussion