BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is 1/k > 0?

Expert replies
by wally » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:05 pm
Hi Folks,

k is not equal to 0,1 or -1. Is 1/k >0?

1) 1/(k-1) > 0
2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Apparently the answer is A.

I was wondering if someone would be able to provide some insight as to how this may be.

[spoiler]In my view each statement is sufficient and hence the answer is D.
For statement 1 and 2 to hold true k > 0. Therefore 1/k > 0.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kirvar » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:25 pm
1. 1/(K-1) >0

For this to be true K cannot be less than 1 and for all values that satisfy this condition, 1/K >0

(Sufficient)

2. 1/(K+1) >0

For this to be true K cannot be less than -1 and therefore K can be negative or positive for which 1/K can be greater than or less than zero.

(Not Sufficient)
Join the discussion

by wally » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:53 pm
Thanks for responding.

I'm still a little puzzled by statement 2. I think my thinking is really stuck in a rut.

For this to be true K cannot be less than -1. I agree.

Example if k = -3

1/(k+1) = 1/(-3+1) = 1/(-2) < 0. And so forth for all k < -1.

As far as I can see k can never be < 0 for this equation to hold true. Yet you state "... therefore K can be negative or positive...". If you could illustrate this condition with an example I would really appreciate it.
Join the discussion

Re: Is 1/k > 0?

by vittalgmat » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:29 pm
wally wrote:Hi Folks,

k is not equal to 0,1 or -1. Is 1/k >0?

1) 1/(k-1) > 0
2) 1/(k+1) > 0

Apparently the answer is A.

I was wondering if someone would be able to provide some insight as to how this may be.

[spoiler]In my view each statement is sufficient and hence the answer is D.
For statement 1 and 2 to hold true k > 0. Therefore 1/k > 0.[/spoiler]
IMO it is D.

In both stmts 1 and 2, K has to be +ve > 1 (coz k cannot be = 0, -1, 1).
so 1/k will be >0

Hope I dint miss anything.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:20 am
please try with k = -1/2 in option 2 and you can see.. 1/K can be < 0 and with k = 1/2 . 1/k can be > 0.


Thus only A
Join the discussion

by wally » Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:37 am
Thanks. That's great. Just what I needed, a different perspective to shift my thinking.

Indeed if k = -1/2
1/(k+1) = (1/(1/2)) = 2 which > 0
whilst 1/k = 1(-1/2) = -2.

Therefore statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT.
Join the discussion

by anshulseth » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:12 am
Its good to pick nos and solve.
I'll try the normal process to explain.

Q is : is 1/k>0
If K is not equal to 0,1,-1.

For it to be true , first of all K has to >0, and K has to be a fraction.
So all we are looking for is:
Is 0<K<1

Stmt I: if 1/k-1>0
Then K>1 and it will not satisfy our condition of 0<k<1.
So 1/K is not >1
Sufficient

Stmt II:
If 1/K+1>0
We can't comment anything on K, as it can be >1,<1 or negative.
So , insufficient.


This, answer is A
Asset
Join the discussion