BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

IR question 2 from the OG online questions

Data Sufficiency, Multi-Source Reasoning, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:39 pm
GMAT Score:640
by Duaabasheer » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 am
Hi Everyone

I am confused as to how this question was tackled .. why are they dividing the Block rate by the lowest rate in host hotel?

What I did rather was multiplied the Block rate * 0.25.. which would total their reimbursement.. and compared that to the lowest rate in host hotel.

If lowest rate was higher than reimbursement then the answer would be no.

Help!

Duaa
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Insights |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 amFollowed by: 120 members
Location: New York City
Thanked: 188 times
GMAT Score:770

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:29 pm
Am I mistaken in thinking we need to know what the ROB strategy is in order to answer this question?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Top
Join the discussion

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 amFollowed by: 120 members
Location: New York City
Thanked: 188 times
GMAT Score:770

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:34 pm
Hey There,

I checked the other question you posted, which clears up what they're talking about. I think you're misunderstanding the process they used here. Instead of calculating the 25% right away, they took a look at what the difference was between the two prices. If the two are close enough together, then the 25% reimbursement is clearly going to be enough to cover the difference. This saves time, because you don't need to actually calculate the 25%.

For the final one, because the ratio is .64, we know immediately that a 25% reimbursement will NOT cover the difference (they would be exactly the same at .75).

Does that make more sense?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 18 times

by tanviet » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:45 pm
I can not see full screen shot. pls, post it again. Thank you
Top
Join the discussion