BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

IR question 2 from the OG online questions

Data Sufficiency, Multi-Source Reasoning, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis
Expert replies
by Duaabasheer » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 am
Hi Everyone

I am confused as to how this question was tackled .. why are they dividing the Block rate by the lowest rate in host hotel?

What I did rather was multiplied the Block rate * 0.25.. which would total their reimbursement.. and compared that to the lowest rate in host hotel.

If lowest rate was higher than reimbursement then the answer would be no.

Help!

Duaa
Attachments
Screen shot 2012-12-14 at 2.27.49 PM.png
Screen shot 2012-12-14 at 2.27.33 PM.png
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Insights |

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:29 pm
Am I mistaken in thinking we need to know what the ROB strategy is in order to answer this question?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Wed Jan 16, 2013 6:34 pm
Hey There,

I checked the other question you posted, which clears up what they're talking about. I think you're misunderstanding the process they used here. Instead of calculating the 25% right away, they took a look at what the difference was between the two prices. If the two are close enough together, then the 25% reimbursement is clearly going to be enough to cover the difference. This saves time, because you don't need to actually calculate the 25%.

For the final one, because the ratio is .64, we know immediately that a 25% reimbursement will NOT cover the difference (they would be exactly the same at .75).

Does that make more sense?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:45 pm
I can not see full screen shot. pls, post it again. Thank you
Join the discussion