Singular or Plural? A number of the crowd is/are.....

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:52 pm
In Manhattan SC Chapter 3, it states 'a number of takes plural verb'

In the example 'a number of students are......'
It states that we consider 'the students' as the subject so that's the reason we take the plural verb.

What happens if we have a collective noun 'crowd' which is singular.

A number of the crowd is/are......

Do we take plural verb as stated by the first definition of 'a number of' OR do we consider 'the crowd' as the subject and take singular verb?

Many Thanks
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:10 members

by anuprajan5 » Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:29 am
Well - a collective noun is not always singular. When the members of the collective noun function as a unit, then the verb will be singular. When they work separately, then the verb will be plural.

Eg:

Singular - The jury agrees that the state prosecutors did not provide enough evidence, so its verdict is not guilty

Plural - The jury disagree about the guilt of the accused and have told the judge that they are hopelessly deadlocked.

This becomes more evident if we rephrase to - The members of the jury disagree about the guilt of the accused

When you state - A number of the crowd are - it seems to me that it's a section of the crowd that is going to do something. Hence this would be plural, though I highly doubt that a sentence would begin with " A number of the crowd"

Regards
Anup

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:20 am
bolkunt wrote: A number of the crowd is/are......
Idiomatically speaking, "a number of" is followed by a plural noun.
- a number of dogs
- a number of ideas
- a number of staples
etc.

So, we'd never say "a number of crowd"
We could say, "a number of crowds are unruly" (but here we are using the plural "crouds")

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:52 pm

by bolkunt » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:22 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
So, we'd never say "a number of crowd"
Hi thanks for your reply, my issue was with "a number of the crowd", I think what you were saying "a number of crowd", you can interpret it as a number of 'crowds' as in there are several crowds and yes, no one will ever say that!

But my case has 'the' which means a number of people in the crowd. My problem was that I would think a number of people would be plural unless we say 'a number of the crowd' as a unit together in which case should be singular? because the crowd is a collective noun and acts as a unit and therefore singular.

Which is why I am so confused. The definition of 'a number of ...' is plural
the collective noun 'the crowd' is singular
together.....?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:52 pm

by bolkunt » Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:36 pm
anuprajan5 wrote:Well - a collective noun is not always singular. When the members of the collective noun function as a unit, then the verb will be singular. When they work separately, then the verb will be plural.

Eg:

Singular - The jury agrees that the state prosecutors did not provide enough evidence, so its verdict is not guilty

Plural - The jury disagree about the guilt of the accused and have told the judge that they are hopelessly deadlocked.

This becomes more evident if we rephrase to - The members of the jury disagree about the guilt of the accused

When you state - A number of the crowd are - it seems to me that it's a section of the crowd that is going to do something. Hence this would be plural, though I highly doubt that a sentence would begin with " A number of the crowd"

Regards
Anup
Thanks for your reply and explaining some stuff I didn't know. Yes I now understand that a collective noun can act be both singular and plural. But in your example, surely it can be both agree and agrees. How can you tell if they act as unit or separately? Also how can it be disagree? Why is the jury acting separately? Don't they have to come to a decision together and act as one unit?

Also I agree that is is unlikely a sentence starts with 'a number of the crowd' but what if it was 'a number of...' and any collective nouns. We would still have the same problem, how can you know if they are acting together or separately if the additional information was limited?

Many thanks

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 60 times
Followed by:10 members

by anuprajan5 » Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:53 am
bolkunt wrote:
Thanks for your reply and explaining some stuff I didn't know. Yes I now understand that a collective noun can act be both singular and plural. But in your example, surely it can be both agree and agrees. How can you tell if they act as unit or separately? Also how can it be disagree? Why is the jury acting separately? Don't they have to come to a decision together and act as one unit?

Also I agree that is is unlikely a sentence starts with 'a number of the crowd' but what if it was 'a number of...' and any collective nouns. We would still have the same problem, how can you know if they are acting together or separately if the additional information was limited?

Many thanks
Well, the unit is not functioning together when they disagree about something. Then the verb becomes plural.

As you have mentioned, they have to come to a decision together. But they can't come to a decision to disagree together :)

And I guess that's the thing with collective nouns. Once you see one on an Sc question, you need to decide whether it is functioning as a unit or the members are functioning independently.

As for A number of + collective noun. Honestly, I am not the expert here, but I still think it will follow the example you have mentioned - A number of crowd, A number of army etc... They will have to conform to A number of crowds or A number of armies which will then make the verb plural in any case.

Regards
Anup

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:52 pm

by bolkunt » Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:20 am
anuprajan5 wrote:
bolkunt wrote:
Thanks for your reply and explaining some stuff I didn't know. Yes I now understand that a collective noun can act be both singular and plural. But in your example, surely it can be both agree and agrees. How can you tell if they act as unit or separately? Also how can it be disagree? Why is the jury acting separately? Don't they have to come to a decision together and act as one unit?

Also I agree that is is unlikely a sentence starts with 'a number of the crowd' but what if it was 'a number of...' and any collective nouns. We would still have the same problem, how can you know if they are acting together or separately if the additional information was limited?

Many thanks
Well, the unit is not functioning together when they disagree about something. Then the verb becomes plural.

As you have mentioned, they have to come to a decision together. But they can't come to a decision to disagree together :)

And I guess that's the thing with collective nouns. Once you see one on an Sc question, you need to decide whether it is functioning as a unit or the members are functioning independently.

As for A number of + collective noun. Honestly, I am not the expert here, but I still think it will follow the example you have mentioned - A number of crowd, A number of army etc... They will have to conform to A number of crowds or A number of armies which will then make the verb plural in any case.

Regards
Anup
Thanks for clearing that up! :)

• Page 1 of 1