MGMAT SC is too technical and too caught up in explaining the grammatical terms which I find to be useless. sometimes the explanations are too technical(grammatically) and not to the point conceptually. Is there an alternate source/book for SC than MGMAT?
Thanks
which book to use
This topic has expert replies
- iwillsurvive101
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:44 pm
- Location: Washington DC
- Thanked: 1 times
- imskpwr
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 10:45 am
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:1 members
Is there an alternate source/book for SC than MGMAT?iwillsurvive101 wrote:MGMAT SC is too technical
[/quote]
I agree that it is condense.
That's an oxymoron.and too caught up in explaining the grammatical terms which I find to be useless. sometimes the explanations are too technical(grammatically) and not to the point conceptually.
I believe you have problem with Manhattan SC as it is too dense.
You can use Powerscore SC. I have heard it is less dense and more "basic and conceptual"(as quoted by you).
Also, you can use a grammar book, if required.